These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26054057)

  • 21. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A high-resolution anisotropic finite-volume head model for EEG source analysis.
    Cook MJ; Koles ZJ
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4536-9. PubMed ID: 17947096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Mixed Finite Element Method to Solve the EEG Forward Problem.
    Vorwerk J; Engwer C; Pursiainen S; Wolters CH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Apr; 36(4):930-941. PubMed ID: 27831869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A full subtraction approach for finite element method based source analysis using constrained Delaunay tetrahedralisation.
    Drechsler F; Wolters CH; Dierkes T; Si H; Grasedyck L
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 19264145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Five-layer realistic finite element head models based on segmented computer tomography data].
    Zhang J; Wu W; Ying X; Yan D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 28(3):587-91. PubMed ID: 21774229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computational aspects of finite element modeling in EEG source localization.
    Awada KA; Jackson DR; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Baumann SB; Papanicolaou AC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Aug; 44(8):736-52. PubMed ID: 9254987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
    Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Realistic and spherical head modeling for EEG forward problem solution: a comparative cortex-based analysis.
    Vatta F; Meneghini F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2010; 2010():972060. PubMed ID: 20169107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Approximate average head models for EEG source imaging.
    Valdés-Hernández PA; von Ellenrieder N; Ojeda-Gonzalez A; Kochen S; Alemán-Gómez Y; Muravchik C; Valdés-Sosa PA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Dec; 185(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 19747944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrode and brain modeling in stereo-EEG.
    von Ellenrieder N; Beltrachini L; Muravchik CH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Sep; 123(9):1745-54. PubMed ID: 22364724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduction of the impact of multiple uncertain conductivity values on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupré L
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Mar; 29(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 23345195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.