These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26054359)

  • 1. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
    García-Pérez MA
    Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibrating the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examination Part I using an integrated item response theory framework: a comparison of models and designs.
    De Champlain AF; Boulais AP; Dallas A
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26883811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractors with information in multiple choice items: a rationale based on the Rasch model.
    Andrich D; Styles I
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 21512214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
    Qiu X; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.
    Safrit MJ; Cohen AS; Costa MG
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models.
    Sheu CF; Chen CT; Su YH; Wang WC
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 May; 37(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 16171193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using polytomous item response models to assess death anxiety.
    Gómez J; Hidalgo MD; Tomás-Sábado J
    Nurs Res; 2007; 56(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17356439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.
    Wang L; Li CS
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):356-78. PubMed ID: 12011504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.
    Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of three polytomous item response theory models in the context of testlet scoring.
    Cook KF; Dodd BG; Fitzpatrick SJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10063769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Note on the
    Dimitrov DM; Luo Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):545-557. PubMed ID: 31105322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision.
    Wang S; Fellouris G; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):375-394. PubMed ID: 30805879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on monotonicity of item response functions for ordered polytomous item response theory models.
    Kang HA; Su YH; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):523-535. PubMed ID: 29516492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the Finiteness of the Weighted Likelihood Estimator of Ability.
    Magis D; Verhelst N
    Psychometrika; 2016 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 27699560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An item analysis of the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression.
    DeSimone JA; James LR
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1872-86. PubMed ID: 26011720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for Local Dependence with the Rasch Model: The Paradox of Information Increase.
    Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):262-282. PubMed ID: 28027051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.