These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26054369)

  • 1. Naïve Tests of Basic Local Independence Model's Invariance.
    Chiusole Dd; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Span J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 18():E26. PubMed ID: 26054369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing parameter invariance in the BLIM: bipartition models.
    de Chiusole D; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Psychometrika; 2013 Oct; 78(4):710-24. PubMed ID: 24092485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary on "Extending the Basic Local Independence Model to Polytomous Data" by Stefanutti, de Chiusole, Anselmi, and Spoto.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF; Ma W
    Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):656-671. PubMed ID: 35713805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling missing data in knowledge space theory.
    de Chiusole D; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Dec; 20(4):506-22. PubMed ID: 26651988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On a Generalization of Local Independence in Item Response Theory Based on Knowledge Space Theory.
    Noventa S; Spoto A; Heller J; Kelava A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):395-421. PubMed ID: 30421075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extending the Basic Local Independence Model to Polytomous Data.
    Stefanutti L; de Chiusole D; Anselmi P; Spoto A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):684-715. PubMed ID: 32959202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical indistinguishability: From the knowledge structure to the skills.
    Spoto A; Stefanutti L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):312-326. PubMed ID: 36366819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Link between Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Knowledge Space Theory.
    Heller J; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):995-1019. PubMed ID: 25838246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models.
    Edwards MC; Houts CR; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):138-149. PubMed ID: 28368176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the actual equivalence of automatically generated items.
    de Chiusole D; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 29340967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing heteroscedasticity in general linear models.
    Rosopa PJ; Schaffer MM; Schroeder AN
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):335-51. PubMed ID: 24015776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the local identifiability of probabilistic knowledge structures.
    Stefanutti L; Heller J; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1197-211. PubMed ID: 22588988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of violations of measurement invariance in cross-lagged panel mediation models.
    Xu J; Zhang Q; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2623-2645. PubMed ID: 32519290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Network Models for Measurement Invariance Assessment When Indicator Residuals are Correlated.
    Finch WH; French BF; Hazelwood A
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Mar; 47(2):106-122. PubMed ID: 36875291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Wang T; Strobl C; Zeileis A; Merkle EC
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):132-155. PubMed ID: 29150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of violating local independence on IRT parameter estimation for the Binomial Trials Model.
    Looney MA; Spray JA
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1992 Dec; 63(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 1439159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing learning processes with the gain-loss model.
    Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 21287111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.