These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography. He RT; Tu MG; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Wu J; Hsu JT BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30674282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of Exposure Parameters and Voxel Size for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on the Image Matching Accuracy with an Optical Dental Scan Image: An In Vitro Study. Mai HN; Lee DH Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6971828. PubMed ID: 34222482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets. Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 23581278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of human mandible. Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130206. PubMed ID: 24404603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chronological changes in the microstructure of bone during peri-implant healing: a microcomputed tomographic evaluation. Fang L; Ding X; Wang HM; Zhu XH Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 52(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 25131999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High-Resolution Cone-Beam Computed Tomography is a Fast and Promising Technique to Quantify Bone Microstructure and Mechanics of the Distal Radius. Mys K; Varga P; Stockmans F; Gueorguiev B; Neumann V; Vanovermeire O; Wyers CE; van den Bergh JPW; van Lenthe GH Calcif Tissue Int; 2021 Mar; 108(3):314-323. PubMed ID: 33452889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of Scanning Resolution on the Prediction of Trabecular Bone Microarchitectures Using Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Tsai MT; He RT; Huang HL; Tu MG; Hsu JT Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32503153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT. Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The relationship between dental implant stability and trabecular bone structure using cone-beam computed tomography. Kang SR; Bok SC; Choi SC; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Kim TI; Yi WJ J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2016 Apr; 46(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 27127692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Of mice, rats and men: trabecular bone architecture in mammals scales to body mass with negative allometry. Barak MM; Lieberman DE; Hublin JJ J Struct Biol; 2013 Aug; 183(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 23639903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robust Quantitative Assessment of Trabecular Microarchitecture in Extremity Cone-Beam CT Using Optimized Segmentation Algorithms. Brehler M; Cao Q; Moseley KF; Osgood G; Morris C; Demehri S; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2018 Feb; 10578():. PubMed ID: 31337926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new algorithm for estimating the rod volume fraction and the trabecular thickness from in vivo computed tomography. Thomsen FS; Peña JA; Lu Y; Huber G; Morlock M; Glüer CC; Delrieux CA Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6598. PubMed ID: 27908155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trabecular shear stress amplification and variability in human vertebral cancellous bone: relationship with age, gender, spine level and trabecular architecture. Yeni YN; Zelman EA; Divine GW; Kim DG; Fyhrie DP Bone; 2008 Mar; 42(3):591-6. PubMed ID: 18180212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging. Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction. Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Grafts With Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. de Moura PM; Hallac R; Kane A; Seaward J Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26101811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional evaluation of human jaw bone microarchitecture: correlation between the microarchitectural parameters of cone beam computed tomography and micro-computer tomography. Kim JE; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Dec; 120(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 26548728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]