79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26055022)
1. Rating Systems to Assess the Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Jauregui JJ; Banerjee S; Cherian JJ; Elmallah RD; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():289-94. PubMed ID: 26055022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Assessment of the Comprehensiveness of Various Hip Outcome Scores.
Mistry JB; Jauregui JJ; Lerner AL; Chughtai M; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2016 Apr; 28():267-74. PubMed ID: 27042780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of an Encompassing Questionnaire for Evaluating the Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Thomas M; Gwam CU; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Roche M; Delanois RE
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jan; 30():306-313. PubMed ID: 28072902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-reported outcome measures versus inertial performance-based outcome measures: A prospective study in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty.
Bolink SA; Grimm B; Heyligers IC
Knee; 2015 Dec; 22(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 26032657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty following aseptic failure.
Kasmire KE; Rasouli MR; Mortazavi SM; Sharkey PF; Parvizi J
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):264-7. PubMed ID: 23159149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty.
Ghanem E; Pawasarat I; Lindsay A; May L; Azzam K; Joshi A; Parvizi J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Oct; 92(14):2445-51. PubMed ID: 20962195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comprehensive Assessment of Various Outcome Scores to Evaluate Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Jauregui JJ; Lerner AL; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2015 Nov; 27():251-6. PubMed ID: 26680406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Outcome Metrics Do the Various Knee Rating Systems for Assessment of Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Measure? A Systematic Review of Literature.
Mont MA; Banerjee S; Jauregui JJ; Cherian JJ; Kapadia BH
Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():269-74. PubMed ID: 26055019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardized Questionnaire Time Burden for Practitioners and Patients.
Pierce TP; Elmallah RD; Cherian JJ; Jauregui JJ; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():302-6. PubMed ID: 26055024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty.
Greidanus NV; Peterson RC; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 20541360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement.
Roos EM; Toksvig-Larsen S
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 May; 1():17. PubMed ID: 12801417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of self-reported knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score to performance measures in patients after total knee arthroplasty.
Stevens-Lapsley JE; Schenkman ML; Dayton MR
PM R; 2011 Jun; 3(6):541-9; quiz 549. PubMed ID: 21665167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time Burden of Standardized Hip Questionnaires.
Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Mistry JB; Gwam CU; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2016 Apr; 28():280-4. PubMed ID: 27042783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.
Klit J
Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4836. PubMed ID: 24814600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.
Mahomed NN; Liang MH; Cook EF; Daltroy LH; Fortin PR; Fossel AH; Katz JN
J Rheumatol; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1273-9. PubMed ID: 12064846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late aquatic therapy after total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Liebs TR; Herzberg W; Rüther W; Haasters J; Russlies M; Hassenpflug J;
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 22196125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinimetric quality of the new 2011 Knee Society score: high validity, low completion rate.
Dinjens RN; Senden R; Heyligers IC; Grimm B
Knee; 2014 Jun; 21(3):647-54. PubMed ID: 24613585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Kirschner S; Walther M; Böhm D; Matzer M; Heesen T; Faller H; König A
Rheumatol Int; 2003 Jan; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12548437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tension controlled ligament balanced total knee arthroplasty: 5-year results of a soft tissue orientated surgical technique.
Wyss T; Schuster AJ; Christen B; Wehrli U
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Feb; 128(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18075748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
