BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26055613)

  • 1. Comparison of endorectal ultrasound versus pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for radiation treatment planning in locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Yu E; DiPetrillo TA; Ramey S; Leonard KL
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(5):e451-e455. PubMed ID: 26055613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) for radiation treatment planning of locally advanced rectal cancer using information from MRI or FDG-PET/CT: a prospective study.
    Brændengen M; Hansson K; Radu C; Siegbahn A; Jacobsson H; Glimelius B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):e439-45. PubMed ID: 21641122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the clinical management and radiation treatment planning of locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Whaley JT; Fernandes AT; Sackmann R; Plastaras JP; Teo BK; Grover S; Perini RF; Metz JM; Pryma DA; Apisarnthanarax S
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 25012830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utility of multimodality imaging with CT and MRI in defining rectal tumour volumes for radiotherapy treatment planning: a pilot study.
    Tan J; Lim Joon D; Fitt G; Wada M; Lim Joon M; Mercuri A; Marr M; Chao M; Khoo V
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Dec; 54(6):562-8. PubMed ID: 21199435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for re-staging rectal cancer after radiotherapy.
    Mezzi G; Arcidiacono PG; Carrara S; Perri F; Petrone MC; De Cobelli F; Gusmini S; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A; Testoni PA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 15(44):5563-7. PubMed ID: 19938195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between the reference values of MRI and EUS and their usefulness to surgeons in rectal cancer.
    Yimei J; Ren Z; Lu X; Huan Z
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Dec; 16(15):2069-77. PubMed ID: 23280021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study.
    Fernández-Esparrach G; Ayuso-Colella JR; Sendino O; Pagés M; Cuatrecasas M; Pellisé M; Maurel J; Ayuso-Colella C; González-Suárez B; Llach J; Castells A; Ginès A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 21802588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
    Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
    Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Bianchi P; Ceriani C; Palmisano A; Pompili G; Passoni GR; Rottoli M; Cappellani A; Montorsi M
    Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-observer agreement of MRI-based tumor delineation for preoperative radiotherapy boost in locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Burbach JP; Kleijnen JP; Reerink O; Seravalli E; Philippens ME; Schakel T; van Asselen B; Raaymakers BW; van Vulpen M; Intven M
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Feb; 118(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 26700601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Staging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience.
    Kocaman O; Baysal B; Şentürk H; İnce AT; Müslümanoğlu M; Kocakoç E; Arıcı S; Uysal Ö; Yıldız K; Türkdoğan K; Danalıoğlu A
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 25(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25599779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results.
    Hünerbein M; Pegios W; Rau B; Vogl TJ; Felix R; Schlag PM
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1005-9. PubMed ID: 11116406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-grade glioma radiation therapy target volumes and patterns of failure obtained from magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-FDOPA positron emission tomography delineations from multiple observers.
    Kosztyla R; Chan EK; Hsu F; Wilson D; Ma R; Cheung A; Zhang S; Moiseenko V; Benard F; Nichol A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):1100-6. PubMed ID: 24161427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.
    Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Kessels AG; Bakers FC; Cappendijk VC; Engelen SM; Lahaye MJ; de Bruïne AP; Lammering G; Leiner T; Verwoerd JL; Wildberger JE; Beets-Tan RG
    Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 21239980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Endorectal MRI and ultrasonography in rectal tumors: correlation with histological staging].
    Heindel W; Gossmann A; St Ernst ; Schäfer H; Kugel H; Krug B; Selzner M; Krahe T; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 9687949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Li H; Li F; Li J; Zhu Y; Zhang Y; Guo Y; Xu M; Shao Q; Liu X
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(15):5353-5361. PubMed ID: 32510183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.