These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26055880)

  • 1. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
    Nori DV; McCord BR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure-based alkaline lysis with immunocapture, a method for enhanced recovery in differential extraction.
    Martinez V; Nori D; Dimsoski P; McCord B
    Electrophoresis; 2017 Nov; 38(21):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 28714088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expedited, chemically enhanced sperm cell recovery from cotton swabs for rape kit analysis.
    Norris JV; Manning K; Linke SJ; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):800-5. PubMed ID: 17524064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
    Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a one-tube extraction and amplification method for DNA analysis of sperm and epithelial cells recovered from forensic samples by laser microdissection.
    Meredith M; Bright JA; Cockerton S; Vintiner S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 21411390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of differential extraction conditions on the premature lysis of spermatozoa.
    Hennekens CM; Cooper ES; Cotton RW; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):744-52. PubMed ID: 23550664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
    Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
    Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salmon sperm DNA increases sample recovery from cotton swabs.
    Oechsle CM; Paul TA; Seichko JD; Worst TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():102996. PubMed ID: 38061289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
    Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
    Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative direct-to-amplification cell lysis techniques for forensically relevant non-sperm cells.
    Arya R; Hudson BC; Green TD
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Nov; 68(6):2116-2127. PubMed ID: 37779342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
    Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced elution of sperm from cotton swabs via enzymatic digestion for rape kit analysis.
    Voorhees JC; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 May; 51(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 16696704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
    Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.