217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26055880)
1. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
Nori DV; McCord BR
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure-based alkaline lysis with immunocapture, a method for enhanced recovery in differential extraction.
Martinez V; Nori D; Dimsoski P; McCord B
Electrophoresis; 2017 Nov; 38(21):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 28714088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expedited, chemically enhanced sperm cell recovery from cotton swabs for rape kit analysis.
Norris JV; Manning K; Linke SJ; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):800-5. PubMed ID: 17524064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a one-tube extraction and amplification method for DNA analysis of sperm and epithelial cells recovered from forensic samples by laser microdissection.
Meredith M; Bright JA; Cockerton S; Vintiner S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 21411390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of differential extraction conditions on the premature lysis of spermatozoa.
Hennekens CM; Cooper ES; Cotton RW; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):744-52. PubMed ID: 23550664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Salmon sperm DNA increases sample recovery from cotton swabs.
Oechsle CM; Paul TA; Seichko JD; Worst TJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():102996. PubMed ID: 38061289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative direct-to-amplification cell lysis techniques for forensically relevant non-sperm cells.
Arya R; Hudson BC; Green TD
J Forensic Sci; 2023 Nov; 68(6):2116-2127. PubMed ID: 37779342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced elution of sperm from cotton swabs via enzymatic digestion for rape kit analysis.
Voorhees JC; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2006 May; 51(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 16696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
