58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26056463)
1. Residual disease and risk factors in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and positive margins after initial conization.
Fu Y; Chen C; Feng S; Cheng X; Wang X; Xie X; Lü W
Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2015; 11():851-6. PubMed ID: 26056463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Factors for Residual Disease in Hysterectomy Specimens After Conization in Post-Menopausal Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3.
Sun X; Lei H; Xie X; Ruan G; An J; Sun P
Int J Gen Med; 2020; 13():1067-1074. PubMed ID: 33204141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization with negative margins.
Fan A; Wang C; Han C; Wang Y; Xue F; Zhang L
J Med Virol; 2018 Sep; 90(9):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 29704442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Laser Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3 and Microinvasive Cervical Cancer.
Kanayama S; Nakagawa E; Ueno S; Muraji M; Wakahashi S; Sudo T; Yamada T; Yamaguchi S; Fujiwara K; Nishimura R
World J Oncol; 2014 Apr; 5(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29147379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive margins after cervical conization as an indicator of residual dysplasia.
Huang M; Anderson P
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):160-161. PubMed ID: 10838299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization: a study of 522 consecutive cervical cones.
Abdul-Karim FW; Nuñez C
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 65(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 3966027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study of conization of the cervix in the management of cervical intraepithelial glandular neoplasia (CIGN)--a preliminary report.
Cullimore JE; Luesley DM; Rollason TP; Byrne P; Buckley CH; Anderson M; Williams DR; Waddell C; Hudson E; Shafi MI
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Apr; 99(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 1316142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive endocervical margins at conization: repeat conization or colposcopic follow-up? A retrospective study.
Chambo Filho A; Garbeloto E; Guarconi JR; Partele MP
J Clin Med Res; 2015 Jul; 7(7):540-4. PubMed ID: 26015819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.
Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer?
Tasci T; Turan T; Ureyen I; Karalok A; Kalyoncu R; Boran N; Tulunay G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 25259663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stage Ia1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: conservative management after laser conization with positive margins.
Itsukaichi M; Kurata H; Matsushita M; Watanabe M; Sekine M; Aoki Y; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 12893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy.
Husseinzadeh N; Shbaro I; Wesseler T
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 May; 33(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 2703181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the risk factors of residual lesions after conization and prognosis of multifocal micro-invasive squamous cell cervical carcinoma treated with different types of surgery.
Luo C; Qiu J; Zhang J; Yuan L; Liu C; Wang C; Li Y; Zhang L; Cheng W
Mol Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 11(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 31475064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease.
Öz M; Çetinkaya N; Korkmaz E; Seçkin KD; Meydanlı MM; Güngör T
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2016; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 27651725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction to: Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Jun; 21(1):228. PubMed ID: 34074277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Redman CWE; Verdoodt F; Kyrgiou M; Tzafetas M; Ghaem-Maghami S; Petry KU; Leeson S; Bergeron C; Nieminen P; Gondry J; Reich O; Moss EL
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1665-1679. PubMed ID: 29126708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 or HPV-18 genotype is a reliable predictor of residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy following a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
Kang WD; Ju UC; Kim SM
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e2. PubMed ID: 26463431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From Diagnosis to Treatment: Exploring the Latest Management Trends in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Gupta S; Nagtode N; Chandra V; Gomase K
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50291. PubMed ID: 38205499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
