378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26057197)
1. Third and fifth graders' processing of parafoveal information in reading: A study in single-word recognition.
Khelifi R; Sparrow L; Casalis S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():1-17. PubMed ID: 26057197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
Dare N; Shillcock R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: evidence from a novel preview manipulation.
Gagl B; Hawelka S; Richlan F; Schuster S; Hutzler F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):588-95. PubMed ID: 24041397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
Veldre A; Andrews S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
Johnson RL; Dunne MD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parafoveal processing and transposed-letter effects in dyslexic reading.
Kirkby JA; Barrington RS; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
Dyslexia; 2022 Aug; 28(3):359-374. PubMed ID: 35818161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
Lee CH; Kim K
Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
Plummer P; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
Inhoff AW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Letter encoding in visual word identification: more evidence for a word-integration explanation for parafoveal preview effects in reading.
Kwantes PJ; Mewhort DJ
Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 11901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
Bernard JB; Castet E
Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parafoveal processing in reading.
Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinct.
Vasilev MR; Yates M; Prueitt E; Slattery TJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Feb; 74(2):254-276. PubMed ID: 32988313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading.
Ashby J; Yang J; Evans KH; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):634-40. PubMed ID: 22361955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency.
Veldre A; Andrews S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):586-95. PubMed ID: 25068856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
