These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26057217)

  • 1. Automated urine screening devices make urine sediment microscopy in diagnostic laboratories economically viable.
    Zaman Z
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 53 Suppl 2():s1509-11. PubMed ID: 26057217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.
    Chien TI; Kao JT; Liu HL; Lin PC; Hong JS; Hsieh HP; Chien MJ
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Sep; 384(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17604012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures.
    Kouri TT; Kähkönen U; Malminiemi K; Vuento R; Rowan RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jul; 112(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10396282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of the performances of the iQ(®)200 ELITE automated urine microscopy analyser and comparison with manual microscopy method].
    Dewulf G; Harrois D; Mazars E; Cattoen C; Canis F
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2011 Oct; 59(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 19942378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].
    Park J; Kim J
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.
    Shayanfar N; Tobler U; von Eckardstein A; Bestmann L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.
    Lamchiagdhase P; Preechaborisutkul K; Lomsomboon P; Srisuchart P; Tantiniti P; Khan-u-Ra N; Preechaborisutkul B
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Automated analysis on urine formed element by using FCM].
    Ito K; Nozaki T
    Rinsho Byori; 2001 Sep; 49(9):847-52. PubMed ID: 11685769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber.
    Altekin E; Kadiçesme O; Akan P; Kume T; Vupa O; Ergor G; Abacioglu H
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 20333768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture.
    Dimech W; Roney K
    Pathology; 2002 Apr; 34(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12009101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser in routine urinalysis.
    van den Broek D; Keularts IM; Wielders JP; Kraaijenhagen RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(11):1635-40. PubMed ID: 19012529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance Evaluation and Comparison of the Fully Automated Urinalysis Analyzers UX-2000 and Cobas 6500.
    Wesarachkitti B; Khejonnit V; Pratumvinit B; Reesukumal K; Meepanya S; Pattanavin C; Wongkrajang P
    Lab Med; 2016 May; 47(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 27069030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.
    Wah DT; Wises PK; Butch AW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 15842056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.
    Bakan E; Bayraktutan Z; Baygutalp NK; Gul MA; Umudum FZ; Bakan N
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Jun; 28(2):020712. PubMed ID: 30022887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.
    Laiwejpithaya S; Wongkrajang P; Reesukumal K; Bucha C; Meepanya S; Pattanavin C; Khejonnit V; Chuntarut A
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 Feb; 32(2):. PubMed ID: 28464263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated urinalysis technology improves efficiency and patient care.
    Cronin M
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2008 Oct; 40(10):30, 32. PubMed ID: 18988553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal criteria for microscopic review of urinalysis following use of automated urine analyzer.
    Khejonnit V; Pratumvinit B; Reesukumal K; Meepanya S; Pattanavin C; Wongkrajang P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jan; 439():1-4. PubMed ID: 25280641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.
    İnce FD; Ellidağ HY; Koseoğlu M; Şimşek N; Yalçın H; Zengin MO
    Pract Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 5():14-20. PubMed ID: 28856199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three automated systems for urine chemistry and sediment analysis in routine laboratory practice.
    Budak YU; Huysal K
    Clin Lab; 2011; 57(1-2):47-52. PubMed ID: 21391464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manual urine microscopy versus automated urine analyzer microscopy in patients with acute kidney injury.
    Sharda N; Bakhtar O; Thajudeen B; Meister E; Szerlip H
    Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):e152-5. PubMed ID: 25425026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.