174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26057262)
21. Enhancing biohydrogen production from sugar industry wastewater using Ni, Ni-Co and Ni-Co-P electrodeposits as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells.
Chaurasia AK; Mondal P
Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 286(Pt 3):131728. PubMed ID: 34416586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hydrogen production from continuous flow, microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells treating fermentation wastewater.
Watson VJ; Hatzell M; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 195():51-6. PubMed ID: 26051523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of the microbial community of the biocathode of a hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cell.
Croese E; Pereira MA; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; Geelhoed JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 92(5):1083-93. PubMed ID: 21983651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Influence of substrate COD on methane production in single-chambered microbial electrolysis cell].
Teng WK; Liu GL; Luo HP; Zhang RD; Fu SY
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1021-6. PubMed ID: 25929072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biotransformation of Furanic and Phenolic Compounds with Hydrogen Gas Production in a Microbial Electrolysis Cell.
Zeng X; Borole AP; Pavlostathis SG
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13667-75. PubMed ID: 26503792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Scaling-up of membraneless microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for domestic wastewater treatment: Bottlenecks and limitations.
Escapa A; San-Martín MI; Mateos R; Morán A
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Mar; 180():72-8. PubMed ID: 25590425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of different substrates on microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) anodic membrane: biodiversity and hydrogen production performance.
Shao Q; Li J; Yang S; Sun H
Water Sci Technol; 2019 Mar; 79(6):1123-1133. PubMed ID: 31070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anode microbial communities produced by changing from microbial fuel cell to microbial electrolysis cell operation using two different wastewaters.
Kiely PD; Cusick R; Call DF; Selembo PA; Regan JM; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):388-94. PubMed ID: 20554197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Continuous high-purity bioelectrochemical nitrogen recovery from high N-loaded wastewaters.
Ul Z; Sulonen M; Baeza JA; Guisasola A
Bioelectrochemistry; 2024 Aug; 158():108707. PubMed ID: 38653107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Concurrent desalination and hydrogen generation using microbial electrolysis and desalination cells.
Luo H; Jenkins PE; Ren Z
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):340-4. PubMed ID: 21121677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of nickle, nickle-cobalt and nickle-cobalt-phosphorus nanocatalysts for enhancing biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells using paper industry wastewater.
Chaurasia AK; Shankar R; Mondal P
J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113542. PubMed ID: 34426219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells.
Wagner RC; Regan JM; Oh SE; Zuo Y; Logan BE
Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1480-8. PubMed ID: 19138783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Upgrading of straw hydrolysate for production of hydrogen and phenols in a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC).
Thygesen A; Marzorati M; Boon N; Thomsen AB; Verstraete W
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Feb; 89(3):855-65. PubMed ID: 21191786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of methanogens within cathodic biofilm in the single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell.
Li X; Zeng C; Lu Y; Liu G; Luo H; Zhang R
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Feb; 274():403-409. PubMed ID: 30551043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Competition of two highly specialized and efficient acetoclastic electroactive bacteria for acetate in biofilm anode of microbial electrolysis cell.
Sapireddy V; Katuri KP; Muhammad A; Saikaly PE
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2021 May; 7(1):47. PubMed ID: 34059681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fate of H2 in an upflow single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell using a metal-catalyst-free cathode.
Lee HS; Torres CI; Parameswaran P; Rittmann BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(20):7971-6. PubMed ID: 19921922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Syntrophic interactions between H2-scavenging and anode-respiring bacteria can improve current density in microbial electrochemical cells.
Gao Y; Ryu H; Santo Domingo JW; Lee HS
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 153():245-53. PubMed ID: 24368273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of setup and carbon source on the bacterial community of biocathodes in microbial electrolysis cells.
Croese E; Jeremiasse AW; Marshall IP; Spormann AM; Euverink GJ; Geelhoed JS; Stams AJ; Plugge CM
Enzyme Microb Technol; 2014; 61-62():67-75. PubMed ID: 24910339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hydrogen production in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell under high applied voltages.
Cui W; Lu Y; Zeng C; Yao J; Liu G; Luo H; Zhang R
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 780():146597. PubMed ID: 34030325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Persistent Hydrogen Production by the Photo-Assisted Microbial Electrolysis Cell Using a p-Type Polyaniline Nanofiber Cathode.
Jeon Y; Kim S
ChemSusChem; 2016 Dec; 9(23):3276-3279. PubMed ID: 27882683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
