These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26057385)
21. An evaluation framework for statistical tests on microarray data. Dondrup M; Hüser AT; Mertens D; Goesmann A J Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 140(1-2):18-26. PubMed ID: 19297690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An alternative method to amplify RNA without loss of signal conservation for expression analysis with a proteinase DNA microarray in the ArrayTube format. Schüler S; Wenz I; Wiederanders B; Slickers P; Ehricht R BMC Genomics; 2006 Jun; 7():144. PubMed ID: 16768788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reuse of imputed data in microarray analysis increases imputation efficiency. Kim KY; Kim BJ; Yi GS BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 5():160. PubMed ID: 15504240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microarray analysis of relative gene expression stability for selection of internal reference genes in the rhesus macaque brain. Noriega NC; Kohama SG; Urbanski HF BMC Mol Biol; 2010 Jun; 11():47. PubMed ID: 20565976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The statistics of identifying differentially expressed genes in Expresso and TM4: a comparison. Sioson AA; Mane SP; Li P; Sha W; Heath LS; Bohnert HJ; Grene R BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 7():215. PubMed ID: 16626497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Novel statistical framework to identify differentially expressed genes allowing transcriptomic background differences. Ling ZQ; Wang Y; Mukaisho K; Hattori T; Tatsuta T; Ge MH; Jin L; Mao WM; Sugihara H Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 20400756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Distributional fold change test - a statistical approach for detecting differential expression in microarray experiments. Farztdinov V; McDyer F Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 Nov; 7(1):29. PubMed ID: 23122055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of microarray analysis for studying periodontitis: low consistency in 2 periodontitis cohort data sets from different platforms and an integrative meta-analysis. Jeon YS; Shivakumar M; Kim D; Kim CS; Lee JS J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2021 Feb; 51(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 33634612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: intraplex method improves reliability. Hanley B Theor Biol Med Model; 2007 Aug; 4():32. PubMed ID: 17727693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing the use of Affymetrix to spotted oligonucleotide microarrays using two retinal pigment epithelium cell lines. Rogojina AT; Orr WE; Song BK; Geisert EE Mol Vis; 2003 Oct; 9():482-96. PubMed ID: 14551534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates. Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cross phenotype normalization of microarray data. Xuan J; Wang Y; Hoffman E; Clarke R Front Biosci (Elite Ed); 2010 Jan; 2(1):171-86. PubMed ID: 20036868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating methods for ranking differentially expressed genes applied to microArray quality control data. Kadota K; Shimizu K BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 12():227. PubMed ID: 21639945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments. Gao X Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of high-throughput biological data using their rank values. Dembélé D Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2276-2291. PubMed ID: 29560792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Methods for evaluating gene expression from Affymetrix microarray datasets. Jiang N; Leach LJ; Hu X; Potokina E; Jia T; Druka A; Waugh R; Kearsey MJ; Luo ZW BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 9():284. PubMed ID: 18559105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma. McAleenan A; Jones HE; Kernohan A; Robinson T; Schmidt L; Dawson S; Kelly C; Spencer Leal E; Faulkner CL; Palmer A; Wragg C; Jefferies S; Brandner S; Vale L; Higgins JP; Kurian KM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Mar; 3(3):CD013387. PubMed ID: 35233774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. Hong F; Breitling R Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 18204063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Noninferiority tests based on concordance correlation coefficient for assessment of the agreement for gene expression data from microarray experiments. Liao CT; Lin CY; Liu JP J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 17365226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A weighted average difference method for detecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data. Kadota K; Nakai Y; Shimizu K Algorithms Mol Biol; 2008 Jun; 3():8. PubMed ID: 18578891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]