BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26057624)

  • 1. Speaker Input Variability Does Not Explain Why Larger Populations Have Simpler Languages.
    Atkinson M; Kirby S; Smith K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129463. PubMed ID: 26057624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adult Learning and Language Simplification.
    Atkinson M; Smith K; Kirby S
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2818-2854. PubMed ID: 30320460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Only the right noise? Effects of phonetic and visual input variability on 14-month-olds' minimal pair word learning.
    Höhle B; Fritzsche T; Meß K; Philipp M; Gafos A
    Dev Sci; 2020 Sep; 23(5):e12950. PubMed ID: 32052548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A New Proposal for Phoneme Acquisition: Computing Speaker-Specific Distribution.
    Choi M; Shukla M
    Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33535398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation.
    Samara A; Smith K; Brown H; Wonnacott E
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 May; 94():85-114. PubMed ID: 28340356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evolutionary account of intermodality differences in statistical learning.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Samuel AG
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2021 Feb; 1486(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 33020959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Larger communities create more systematic languages.
    Raviv L; Meyer A; Lev-Ari S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 286(1907):20191262. PubMed ID: 31311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of social network size on speech perception.
    Lev-Ari S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2249-2260. PubMed ID: 30226426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It takes a village: The role of community size in linguistic regularization.
    Kocab A; Ziegler J; Snedeker J
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Nov; 114():101227. PubMed ID: 31325817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):533-44. PubMed ID: 26328670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regularization of languages by adults and children: A mathematical framework.
    Rische JL; Komarova NL
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Feb; 84():1-30. PubMed ID: 26580218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing language input following market integration in a Yucatec Mayan community.
    Padilla-Iglesias C; Woodward AL; Goldin-Meadow S; Shneidman LA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252926. PubMed ID: 34153044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social scale and structural complexity in human languages.
    Nettle D
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Jul; 367(1597):1829-36. PubMed ID: 22641821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infants' selective use of reliable cues in multidimensional language input.
    Potter CE; Lew-Williams C
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 55(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 30284882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the input on the development of the LC bias: a crosslinguistic comparison.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Hayashi A; Tsuji S; Mazuka R; Nazzi T
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 24858107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rate of language evolution is affected by population size.
    Bromham L; Hua X; Fitzpatrick TG; Greenhill SJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(7):2097-102. PubMed ID: 25646448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning speaker-specific characteristics with a deep neural architecture.
    Chen K; Salman A
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1744-56. PubMed ID: 21954206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical language learning: computational, maturational, and linguistic constraints.
    Newport EL
    Lang Cogn; 2016 Sep; 8(3):447-461. PubMed ID: 28680505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning language from the input: why innate constraints can't explain noun compounding.
    Ramscar M; Dye M
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Feb; 62(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 21145445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rhythmic variability between speakers: articulatory, prosodic, and linguistic factors.
    Dellwo V; Leemann A; Kolly MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1513-28. PubMed ID: 25786962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.