BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2605764)

  • 1. Pulpal response to a spherical-submicrofilled resin; the effectiveness of a film-like lining material adhesive to dentin as pulp protection.
    Fujita T; Sasama E; Ishikawa T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1989 Feb; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2605764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pulp response to a spherical sub-microfilled resin and its effectiveness in pulp protection with a dentin-adhesive lining material].
    Fujita T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1986 Apr; 86(4):587-624. PubMed ID: 3018938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinico-pathological studies on the effects of pulp protection (lining) under the condition with and without smear layers].
    Kato S
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 May; 90(5):689-725. PubMed ID: 2134971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histo-pathological study of a glass-ionomer/resin (Geristore) restoration system.
    Nakazawa Y; Mitsui K; Hirai Y; Takahashi K; Ishikawa T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Nov; 35(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 8689733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of pulpal response to an adhesive composite resin restoration using A NPG primer and a PMDM monomer (Mirage-Bond).
    Nakazawa Y; Ishikawa T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1993 Aug; 34(3):115-34. PubMed ID: 8181109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
    Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histo-pathological study of pulp response to a composite resin restoration with two lining materials.
    Aoki S; Ishikawa T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1990 Nov; 31(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 2133452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
    Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Blixt M; Coli P
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 8511279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulpal reaction and microorganisms under Clearfil Composite Resin in deep cavities with acid etched dentin.
    Torstenson B; Nordenvall KJ; Brännström M
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(4):167-76. PubMed ID: 6960501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response of human pulp capped with a bonding agent after bleeding control with hemostatic agents.
    Accorinte Mde L; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Muench A; de Araújo VC
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 15853098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites.
    Murray PE; Windsor LJ; Hafez AA; Stevenson RG; Cox CF
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 12760695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity.
    Unemori M; Matsuya Y; Akashi A; Goto Y; Akamine A
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 15301216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpal response to a new adhesive restorative resin.
    Inokoshi S; Iwaku M; Fusayama T
    J Dent Res; 1982 Aug; 61(8):1014-9. PubMed ID: 6955336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentin matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in nonhuman primate teeth.
    Duque C; Hebling J; Smith AJ; Giro EM; Oliveira MF; de Souza Costa CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 16671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.