These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26058104)

  • 1. Rekindling the immortal debate- telecobalt versus linear accelerator.
    Susheela SP; Revannasiddaiah S
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(1):243-4. PubMed ID: 26058104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Functional disorders of cardiac pacemakers caused by irradiation with a linear accelerator and telecobalt equipment].
    Poier E; Anelli-Monti M; Leitner H; Stücklschweiger G; Zurl B; Arian-Schad K
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 2():160-1. PubMed ID: 2223971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment planning for irradiation of breast cancer--comparative study of physical aspects of cobalt vs linear accelerator.
    Deore SM; Saple MP; Pandhi R; Dinshaw KA
    Indian J Cancer; 1985 Jun; 22(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 3842133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Point/Counterpoint. Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co-60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams.
    Ganesan R; McEwen MR; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5003-6. PubMed ID: 26328950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proposed definitions for isodose flatness and symmetry in clinical radiotherapy beams.
    Galiano E; Joly T; Wiebe F
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004 Dec; 61(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 15388134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface dose for five telecobalt machines, 6MV photon beam from four linear accelerators and a Hi-Art Tomotherapy.
    Kinhikar RA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Oct; 7(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 18783288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo based investigations of electron contamination from telecobalt unit head in build up region and its impact on surface dose.
    Jagtap AS; Palani Selvam T; Patil BJ; Chavan ST; Pethe SN; Kulkarni G; Dahiwale SS; Bhoraskar VN; Dhole SD
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Dec; 118():175-181. PubMed ID: 27642727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Therac 6 linear accelerator for radiation therapy.
    Grant W; Ames J; Almond PR
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(5):448-9. PubMed ID: 101762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [20 years of experience in using high-energy electron accelerators].
    Zhakov IG; Muravskaia GV; Tarutin IG
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1990 Oct; 35(10):37-40. PubMed ID: 2146460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of maintenance costs of cobalt machines and linear accelerators.
    van der Giessen PH
    Radiother Oncol; 1991 Jan; 20(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 2020757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The determination of absorbed dose in a proton beam for purposes of charged-particle radiation therapy.
    Verhey LJ; Koehler AM; McDonald JC; Goitein M; Ma IC; Schneider RJ; Wagner M
    Radiat Res; 1979 Jul; 79(1):34-54. PubMed ID: 472125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potentialities of synchrotron radiation in experimental and clinical radiation surgery.
    Larsson B
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 365():58-64. PubMed ID: 6433653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effectiveness of linear accelerators.
    Graham MV
    Rays; 1999; 24(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 10605297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Practical application of optimization criteria for geometrical distributions of irradiation doses. II. Comparison between Co-60 radiation and 15 MeV photon radiation of a linear accelerator (author's transl)].
    Amel-Zadeh A; Gremmel H; Hebbinghaus D; Ihnen E; Wendhausen H
    Strahlentherapie; 1982 Apr; 158(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 6808712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maintenance costs for cobalt machines and linear accelerators: new machines versus old.
    van der Giessen P
    Radiother Oncol; 2002 Mar; 62(3):349-50. PubMed ID: 12175567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of dose distribution patterns from cobalt-60 and Varian Clinac-4 beams.
    Nair R; Kartha M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 413401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photonuclear isotope characterization of a Siemens KDS 18 MV linac head.
    Roig M; Panettieri V; Ginjaume M; Sánchez-Reyes A
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):N243-6. PubMed ID: 15357204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cobalt-60 Machines and Medical Linear Accelerators: Competing Technologies for External Beam Radiotherapy.
    Healy BJ; van der Merwe D; Christaki KE; Meghzifene A
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Feb; 29(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 27908503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetry and techniques for simultaneous hyperthermia and external beam radiation therapy.
    Straube WL; Klein EE; Moros EG; Low DA; Myerson RJ
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2001; 17(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 11212880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapy imaging: source sizes of radiotherapy beams.
    Munro P; Rawlinson JA; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 3211044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.