273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26058579)
1. Metaproteomic analysis using the Galaxy framework.
Jagtap PD; Blakely A; Murray K; Stewart S; Kooren J; Johnson JE; Rhodus NL; Rudney J; Griffin TJ
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3553-65. PubMed ID: 26058579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disseminating Metaproteomic Informatics Capabilities and Knowledge Using the Galaxy-P Framework.
Blank C; Easterly C; Gruening B; Johnson J; Kolmeder CA; Kumar P; May D; Mehta S; Mesuere B; Brown Z; Elias JE; Hervey WJ; McGowan T; Muth T; Nunn B; Rudney J; Tanca A; Griffin TJ; Jagtap PD
Proteomes; 2018 Jan; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 29385081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible and accessible workflows for improved proteogenomic analysis using the Galaxy framework.
Jagtap PD; Johnson JE; Onsongo G; Sadler FW; Murray K; Wang Y; Shenykman GM; Bandhakavi S; Smith LM; Griffin TJ
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5898-908. PubMed ID: 25301683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MetaLab: an automated pipeline for metaproteomic data analysis.
Cheng K; Ning Z; Zhang X; Li L; Liao B; Mayne J; Stintzi A; Figeys D
Microbiome; 2017 Dec; 5(1):157. PubMed ID: 29197424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel clinical metaproteomics workflow enables bioinformatic analysis of host-microbe dynamics in disease.
Do K; Mehta S; Wagner R; Bhuming D; Rajczewski AT; Skubitz APN; Johnson JE; Griffin TJ; Jagtap PD
mSphere; 2024 May; ():e0079323. PubMed ID: 38780289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis.
Sajulga R; Easterly C; Riffle M; Mesuere B; Muth T; Mehta S; Kumar P; Johnson J; Gruening BA; Schiebenhoefer H; Kolmeder CA; Fuchs S; Nunn BL; Rudney J; Griffin TJ; Jagtap PD
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241503. PubMed ID: 33170893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Navigating through metaproteomics data: a logbook of database searching.
Muth T; Kolmeder CA; Salojärvi J; Keskitalo S; Varjosalo M; Verdam FJ; Rensen SS; Reichl U; de Vos WM; Rapp E; Martens L
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3439-53. PubMed ID: 25778831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MetaNovo: An open-source pipeline for probabilistic peptide discovery in complex metaproteomic datasets.
Potgieter MG; Nel AJM; Fortuin S; Garnett S; Wendoh JM; Tabb DL; Mulder NJ; Blackburn JM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Jun; 19(6):e1011163. PubMed ID: 37327214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-omics Visualization Platform: An extensible Galaxy plug-in for multi-omics data visualization and exploration.
McGowan T; Johnson JE; Kumar P; Sajulga R; Mehta S; Jagtap PD; Griffin TJ
Gigascience; 2020 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32236523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enrichment or depletion? The impact of stool pretreatment on metaproteomic characterization of the human gut microbiota.
Tanca A; Palomba A; Pisanu S; Addis MF; Uzzau S
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3474-85. PubMed ID: 25677681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-throughput metaproteomics data analysis with Unipept: A tutorial.
Mesuere B; Van der Jeugt F; Willems T; Naessens T; Devreese B; Martens L; Dawyndt P
J Proteomics; 2018 Jan; 171():11-22. PubMed ID: 28552653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Galaxy-P to leverage RNA-Seq for the discovery of novel protein variations.
Sheynkman GM; Johnson JE; Jagtap PD; Shortreed MR; Onsongo G; Frey BL; Griffin TJ; Smith LM
BMC Genomics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):703. PubMed ID: 25149441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. metaSpectraST: an unsupervised and database-independent analysis workflow for metaproteomic MS/MS data using spectrum clustering.
Hao C; Elias JE; Lee PKH; Lam H
Microbiome; 2023 Aug; 11(1):176. PubMed ID: 37550758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A complete and flexible workflow for metaproteomics data analysis based on MetaProteomeAnalyzer and Prophane.
Schiebenhoefer H; Schallert K; Renard BY; Trappe K; Schmid E; Benndorf D; Riedel K; Muth T; Fuchs S
Nat Protoc; 2020 Oct; 15(10):3212-3239. PubMed ID: 32859984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the quality of genome, protein sequence, and taxonomy databases: a prerequisite for microbiome meta-omics 2.0.
Pible O; Armengaud J
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3418-23. PubMed ID: 26038180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metaproteomic data analysis at a glance: advances in computational microbial community proteomics.
Muth T; Renard BY; Martens L
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2016 Aug; 13(8):757-69. PubMed ID: 27376173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MAPLE: A Microbiome Analysis Pipeline Enabling Optimal Peptide Search and Comparative Taxonomic and Functional Analysis.
Huang W; Kane MA
J Proteome Res; 2021 May; 20(5):2882-2894. PubMed ID: 33848166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing metaproteomics database construction: lessons from a study of the vaginal microbiome.
Lee EM; Srinivasan S; Purvine SO; Fiedler TL; Leiser OP; Proll SC; Minot SS; Deatherage Kaiser BL; Fredricks DN
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0067822. PubMed ID: 37350639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Catching the tip of the iceberg - evaluation of sample preparation protocols for metaproteomic studies of the rumen microbiota.
Deusch S; Seifert J
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3590-5. PubMed ID: 25765363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel Bioinformatics Strategies Driving Dynamic Metaproteomic Studies.
Simopoulos CMA; Figeys D; Lavallée-Adam M
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2456():319-338. PubMed ID: 35612752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
