133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26058704)
1. Species sensitivity weighted distribution for ecological risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: the n-TiO2 case study.
Semenzin E; Lanzellotto E; Hristozov D; Critto A; Zabeo A; Giubilato E; Marcomini A
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2644-59. PubMed ID: 26058704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials.
Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A
Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment strategies for nanoscale and fine-sized titanium dioxide particles: Recognizing hazard and exposure issues.
Warheit DB; Donner EM
Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 85():138-47. PubMed ID: 26362081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In situ effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on community structure of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates.
Jovanović B; Milošević D; Piperac MS; Savić A
Environ Pollut; 2016 Jun; 213():278-282. PubMed ID: 26924756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecotoxicity of engineered TiO2 nanoparticles to saltwater organisms: an overview.
Minetto D; Libralato G; Volpi Ghirardini A
Environ Int; 2014 May; 66():18-27. PubMed ID: 24509165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Common freshwater bacteria vary in their responses to short-term exposure to nano-TiO2.
Binh CT; Tong T; Gaillard JF; Gray KA; Kelly JJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Feb; 33(2):317-27. PubMed ID: 24352762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying adverse outcome pathways and species sensitivity-weighted distribution to predicted-no-effect concentration derivation and quantitative ecological risk assessment for bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in aquatic environments: A case study on Tianjin City, China.
Wang Y; Na G; Zong H; Ma X; Yang X; Mu J; Wang L; Lin Z; Zhang Z; Wang J; Zhao J
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Feb; 37(2):551-562. PubMed ID: 28984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing species sensitivity distributions for metallic nanomaterials considering the characteristics of nanomaterials, experimental conditions, and different types of endpoints.
Chen G; Peijnenburg WJGM; Xiao Y; Vijver MG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():563-570. PubMed ID: 28390859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Material-specific properties applied to an environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials - implications on grouping and read-across concepts.
Wigger H; Nowack B
Nanotoxicology; 2019 Jun; 13(5):623-643. PubMed ID: 30727799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions.
Duboudin C; Ciffroy P; Magaud H
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Feb; 23(2):489-99. PubMed ID: 14982398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO
Hong H; Adam V; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Sep; 40(9):2629-2639. PubMed ID: 34171135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Accumulation and Biotransformation in Typical Freshwater Algae Species Influenced by Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Under Long-term Exposure].
Li JL; Wang ZH; Yan YM; Huang B; Luo ZX
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 Feb; 38(2):832-836. PubMed ID: 29964544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The potential health challenges of TiO2 nanomaterials.
Sha B; Gao W; Cui X; Wang L; Xu F
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Oct; 35(10):1086-101. PubMed ID: 26179748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.
Obiakor MO; Tighe M; Wang Z; Ezeonyejiaku CD; Pereg L; Wilson SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):25276-25290. PubMed ID: 28929352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to measure hazards/risks following exposures to nanoscale or pigment-grade titanium dioxide particles.
Warheit DB
Toxicol Lett; 2013 Jul; 220(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 23603385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nano-titanium dioxide bioreactivity with human alveolar type-I-like epithelial cells: Investigating crystalline phase as a critical determinant.
Sweeney S; Berhanu D; Ruenraroengsak P; Thorley AJ; Valsami-Jones E; Tetley TD
Nanotoxicology; 2015 May; 9(4):482-92. PubMed ID: 25137294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhance inorganic arsenic bioavailability and methylation in two freshwater algae species.
Luo Z; Wang Z; Yan Y; Li J; Yan C; Xing B
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():631-637. PubMed ID: 29614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of food-grade titanium dioxide: the presence of nanosized particles.
Yang Y; Doudrick K; Bi X; Hristovski K; Herckes P; Westerhoff P; Kaegi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(11):6391-400. PubMed ID: 24754874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data.
Menard A; Drobne D; Jemec A
Environ Pollut; 2011 Mar; 159(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 21186069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling for dietary risk assessment of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles.
Bachler G; von Goetz N; Hungerbuhler K
Nanotoxicology; 2015 May; 9(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25058655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
