These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26058709)
1. Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology. Bruza PD; Wang Z; Busemeyer JR Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 19(7):383-93. PubMed ID: 26058709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantum principles in psychology: the debate, the evidence, and the future. Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):310-27. PubMed ID: 23814869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On quantum models of the human mind. Wang H; Sun Y Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 24259276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Wang Z; Busemeyer JR; Atmanspacher H; Pothos EM Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):672-88. PubMed ID: 24027215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The implicit possibility of dualism in quantum probabilistic cognitive modeling. Mender D Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):298-9. PubMed ID: 23673045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open parallel cooperative and competitive decision processes: a potential provenance for quantum probability decision models. Fuss IG; Navarro DJ Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):818-43. PubMed ID: 24019237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantum modeling of common sense. Noori HR; Spanagel R Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):302. PubMed ID: 23673048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The rational status of quantum cognition. Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Shiffrin RM; Yearsley JM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jul; 146(7):968-987. PubMed ID: 28447840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cold and hot cognition: quantum probability theory and realistic psychological modeling. Corr PJ Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 23673029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. If quantum probability = classical probability + bounded cognition; is this good, bad, or unnecessary? Rakow T Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):304-5. PubMed ID: 23673051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Aerts D; Gabora L; Sozzo S Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):737-72. PubMed ID: 24039114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is quantum probability rational? Houston AI; Wiesner K Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 23673037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond quantum probability: another formalism shared by quantum physics and psychology. Dzhafarov EN; Kujala JV Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 23673030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty about the value of quantum probability for cognitive modeling. Behme C Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 23673026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditions for quantum interference in cognitive sciences. Yukalov VI; Sornette D Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 24259280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a physical theory of quantum cognition. Takahashi T Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 24482329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy. Tentori K; Crupi V Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]