365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26059970)
1. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
Kardos M; Luikart G; Allendorf FW
Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations.
Ferenčaković M; Hamzić E; Gredler B; Solberg TR; Klemetsdal G; Curik I; Sölkner J
J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Aug; 130(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 23855630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaching autozygosity in a small pedigree of Gochu Asturcelta pigs.
Arias KD; Gutiérrez JP; Fernández I; Álvarez I; Goyache F
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):74. PubMed ID: 37880572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy.
Marras G; Gaspa G; Sorbolini S; Dimauro C; Ajmone-Marsan P; Valentini A; Williams JL; Macciotta NP
Anim Genet; 2015 Apr; 46(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 25530322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal.
Wells DA; Cant MA; Nichols HJ; Hoffman JI
Mol Ecol; 2018 May; 27(9):2271-2288. PubMed ID: 29603504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of genomic inbreeding parameters in seven commercial and autochthonous pig breeds.
Schiavo G; Bovo S; Bertolini F; Tinarelli S; Dall'Olio S; Nanni Costa L; Gallo M; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):910-920. PubMed ID: 31928538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic Variation of Inbreeding and Ancestry in the Remaining Two Isle Royale Wolves.
Hedrick PW; Kardos M; Peterson RO; Vucetich JA
J Hered; 2017 Mar; 108(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 27940471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Runs of Homozygosity and NetView analyses provide new insight into the genome-wide diversity and admixture of three German cattle breeds.
Addo S; Klingel S; Hinrichs D; Thaller G
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225847. PubMed ID: 31800604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using whole-genome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding.
Bjelland DW; Weigel KA; Vukasinovic N; Nkrumah JD
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4697-706. PubMed ID: 23684028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-based partitioning of individual genomic inbreeding levels in Belgian Blue cattle.
Solé M; Gori AS; Faux P; Bertrand A; Farnir F; Gautier M; Druet T
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):92. PubMed ID: 29273000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of runs of homozygosity islands and estimates of genomic inbreeding in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Peripolli E; Stafuzza NB; Munari DP; Lima ALF; Irgang R; Machado MA; Panetto JCDC; Ventura RV; Baldi F; da Silva MVGB
BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 29316879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic diversity analysis of two commercial breeds of pigs using genomic and pedigree data.
Zanella R; Peixoto JO; Cardoso FF; Cardoso LL; Biegelmeyer P; Cantão ME; Otaviano A; Freitas MS; Caetano AR; Ledur MC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():24. PubMed ID: 27029213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of marker-based estimators of inbreeding and inbreeding depression.
Caballero A; Fernández A; Villanueva B; Toro MA
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Dec; 54(1):82. PubMed ID: 36575379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autozygosity islands and ROH patterns in Nellore lineages: evidence of selection for functionally important traits.
Peripolli E; Metzger J; de Lemos MVA; Stafuzza NB; Kluska S; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Berton MP; Lopes FB; Munari DP; Lôbo RB; Magnabosco CU; Di Croce F; Osterstock J; Denise S; Pereira ASC; Baldi F
BMC Genomics; 2018 Sep; 19(1):680. PubMed ID: 30223795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of runs of homozygosity for estimation of recent inbreeding in Holstein cattle.
Gurgul A; Szmatoła T; Topolski P; Jasielczuk I; Żukowski K; Bugno-Poniewierska M
J Appl Genet; 2016 Nov; 57(4):527-530. PubMed ID: 26803654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic diversity and the application of runs of homozygosity-based methods for inbreeding estimation in German White-headed Mutton sheep.
Addo S; Klingel S; Thaller G; Hinrichs D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250608. PubMed ID: 33956807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suitability of Pedigree Information and Genomic Methods for Analyzing Inbreeding of Polish Cold-Blooded Horses Covered by Conservation Programs.
Polak G; Gurgul A; Jasielczuk I; Szmatoła T; Krupiński J; Bugno-Poniewierska M
Genes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33802830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
