These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26060822)

  • 1. Need for scientific rigor in the evaluation of minimally invasive alternative procedures.
    Padulo J; Ardigò LP
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():876496. PubMed ID: 26060822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device.
    Alexandre A; Alexandre AM; De Pretto M; Corò L; Saggini R
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():176936. PubMed ID: 24822181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chiu JC
    Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():265-75. PubMed ID: 17029185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.
    Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 20075811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comment on the paper "Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" (Travis Hunt et al.).
    Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):315. PubMed ID: 17520300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter to the Editor concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" by A. Colak et al. (2008) Eur Spine J;17:1745-51.
    Zhang H
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1321-3. PubMed ID: 25822592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Hue Zhang concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" by A. Colak et al. (2008) Eur Spine J; 17:1745-1751.
    Şimşek H; Çolak A
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1324-5. PubMed ID: 25822593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [If it becomes too narrow for the spinal cord--plea for a joint venture].
    Rompe JD; Pfeil J
    Orthopade; 2003 Oct; 32(10):847. PubMed ID: 14579014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression.
    Tredway TL
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2006 Oct; 17(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 17010897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter to the editor concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" (A. Colak et al., Eur Spine J (2008) 17:1745-1751).
    Crock HV
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):918; author reply 919. PubMed ID: 19352728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcome of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Toyoda H; Nakamura H; Konishi S; Dohzono S; Kato M; Matsuda H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 20847714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
    Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lumbar canal spinal stenosis due to axial skeletal calcinosis and heterotopic ossification in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: successful spinal decompression.
    Weerakoon A; Sharp D; Chapman J; Clunie G
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2011 Nov; 50(11):2144-6. PubMed ID: 21875878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation on effect of the reformative laminectomy for treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis].
    Zhang SD; Feng SB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Jan; 22(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 19203042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New image-guided ultra-minimally invasive lumbar decompression method: the mild procedure.
    Deer TR; Kapural L
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20119461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Moojen WA; Peul WC
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1664. PubMed ID: 25832624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.
    Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.