These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26060938)

  • 1. Habitat-mediated carry-over effects lead to context-dependent outcomes of species interactions.
    Van Allen BG; Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Nov; 84(6):1646-56. PubMed ID: 26060938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carryover effects drive competitive dominance in spatially structured environments.
    Van Allen BG; Rudolf VH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(25):6939-44. PubMed ID: 27298356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ghosts of habitats past: environmental carry-over effects drive population dynamics in novel habitat.
    Van Allen BG; Rudolf VH
    Am Nat; 2013 May; 181(5):596-608. PubMed ID: 23594544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Snake co-occurrence patterns are best explained by habitat and hypothesized effects of interspecific interactions.
    Steen DA; McClure CJ; Brock JC; Craig Rudolph D; Pierce JB; Lee JR; Jeffrey Humphries W; Gregory BB; Sutton WB; Smith LL; Baxley DL; Stevenson DJ; Guyer C
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):286-95. PubMed ID: 23998642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Community context and dispersal stochasticity drive variation in spatial spread.
    Dallas T; Melbourne B; Hastings A
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Nov; 89(11):2657-2664. PubMed ID: 32890416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE EFFECT OF COEXISTENCE ON COMPETITIVE OUTCOME IN TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM AND TRIBOLIUM CONFUSUM.
    Goodnight CJ; Craig DM
    Evolution; 1996 Jun; 50(3):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 28565286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coexistence and invasibility in a two-species competition model with habitat-preference.
    Pigolotti S; Cencini M
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Aug; 265(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 20665971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial abundance and stochasticity influence competitive outcome in communities.
    Dallas T; Melbourne BA; Legault G; Hastings A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jul; 90(7):1691-1700. PubMed ID: 33759453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of extinction-colonization dynamics in Mediterranean butterflies: the role of landscape, climate and local habitat features.
    Fernández-Chacón A; Stefanescu C; Genovart M; Nichols JD; Hines JE; Páramo F; Turco M; Oro D
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 23957287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habitat heterogeneity mediates effects of individual variation on spatial species coexistence.
    Chen D; Liao J; Bearup D; Li Z
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1919):20192436. PubMed ID: 31964303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stable trimorphic coexistence in a lattice model of spatial competition with two site types.
    Karonen I
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Feb; 295():77-85. PubMed ID: 22037045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: what do we really know?
    Bolker BM; Pacala SW; Neuhauser C
    Am Nat; 2003 Aug; 162(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 12858259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for effects of climate change on competitive relationships and coexistence between two bird species.
    Stenseth NC; Durant JM; Fowler MS; Matthysen E; Adriaensen F; Jonzén N; Chan KS; Liu H; De Laet J; Sheldon BC; Visser ME; Dhondt AA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 May; 282(1807):20141958. PubMed ID: 25904659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of asymmetric dispersal on the coexistence of competing species.
    Salomon Y; Connolly SR; Bode L
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Apr; 13(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 20100238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interspecific competition slows range expansion and shapes range boundaries.
    Legault G; Bitters ME; Hastings A; Melbourne BA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(43):26854-26860. PubMed ID: 33055210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Habitat Destruction and Competitive Coexistence in Spatially Explicit Models with Local Interactions.
    Neuhauser C
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Aug; 193(3):445-463. PubMed ID: 9735272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Competitive mechanism of non - predator - prey metapopulation system based on competition and dispersal ability].
    Liang R; Lin Z
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2006 Jun; 17(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 16964928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation between individuals fosters regional species coexistence.
    Uriarte M; Menge D
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1496-1504. PubMed ID: 30084129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats.
    Agashe D
    Am Nat; 2009 Aug; 174(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 19519220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.