These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061498)
1. Validation of Perfusion Quantification with 3D Gradient Echo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Blood Pool Contrast Agent in Skeletal Swine Muscle. Hindel S; Sauerbrey A; Maaß M; Maderwald S; Schlamann M; Lüdemann L PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128060. PubMed ID: 26061498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent. Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic models for perfusion imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in porcine skeletal muscle using low-molecular-weight contrast agents. Hindel S; Papanastasiou G; Wust P; Maaß M; Söhner A; Lüdemann L Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jun; 79(6):3154-3162. PubMed ID: 29096037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishment of a swine model for validation of perfusion measurement by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Sauerbrey A; Hindel S; Maaß M; Krüger C; Wissmann A; Kramer M; Nafz B; Lüdemann L Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():390506. PubMed ID: 24719859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Blood Volume Fraction Quantification with 3D Gradient Echo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscle. Hindel S; Söhner A; Maaß M; Sauerwein W; Möllmann D; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170841. PubMed ID: 28141810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Interstitial Fractional Volume Quantification by Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscles. Hindel S; Söhner A; Maa M; Sauerwein W; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L Invest Radiol; 2017 Jan; 52(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 27482651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [MR-Imaging of lower leg muscle perfusion]. Leppek R; Hoos O; Sattler A; Kohle S; Azzam S; Al Haffar I; Keil B; Ricken P; Klose KJ; Alfke H Herz; 2004 Feb; 29(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 14968340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in multiple sclerosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 3D at 3T. Ingrisch M; Sourbron S; Morhard D; Ertl-Wagner B; Kümpfel T; Hohlfeld R; Reiser M; Glaser C Invest Radiol; 2012 Apr; 47(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 22373532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved hepatic arterial fraction estimation using cardiac output correction of arterial input functions for liver DCE MRI. Chouhan MD; Bainbridge A; Atkinson D; Punwani S; Mookerjee RP; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1533-1546. PubMed ID: 28002045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence. Franiel T; Lüdemann L; Rudolph B; Rehbein H; Staack A; Taupitz M; Prochnow D; Beyersdorff D Invest Radiol; 2008 Jul; 43(7):481-7. PubMed ID: 18580330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Armbruster M; Sourbron S; Haug A; Zech CJ; Ingrisch M; Auernhammer CJ; Nikolaou K; Paprottka PM; Rist C; Reiser MF; Sommer WH Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24002080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]