241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061615)
1. CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations: a systematic review.
Patzelt SB; Spies BC; Kohal RJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():77-85. PubMed ID: 26061615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival and complications of computer aided-designing and computer-aided manufacturing vs. conventionally fabricated implant-supported reconstructions: a systematic review.
Harder S; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():48-54. PubMed ID: 19663948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures.
Kapos T; Evans C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():117-36. PubMed ID: 24660194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review.
Le M; Papia E; Larsson C
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 42(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 25580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of reporting of clinical studies to assess and compare performance of implant-supported restorations.
Pjetursson BE; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():139-59. PubMed ID: 22533954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Zirconia-Based Screw-Retained Prostheses Supported by Implants: A Retrospective Study on Technical Complications and Failures.
Worni A; Kolgeci L; Rentsch-Kollar A; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1073-81. PubMed ID: 24576088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes in the partially edentulous patient?
Weber HP; Sukotjo C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():140-72. PubMed ID: 18437795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates.
Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Zwahlen M; Hämmerle CH; Schneider D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():163-201. PubMed ID: 23062142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. First clinical experiences with CAD/CAM-fabricated PMMA-based fixed dental prostheses as long-term temporaries.
Huettig F; Prutscher A; Goldammer C; Kreutzer CA; Weber H
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 25898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics.
Guess PC; Att W; Strub JR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):633-45. PubMed ID: 21176095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-reported outcome measures focusing on aesthetics of implant- and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wittneben JG; Wismeijer D; Brägger U; Joda T; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():224-240. PubMed ID: 30328183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).
Pjetursson BE; Brägger U; Lang NP; Zwahlen M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():97-113. PubMed ID: 17594374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CAD/CAM fabrication accuracy of long- vs. short-span implant-supported FDPs.
Katsoulis J; Müller P; Mericske-Stern R; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 25363301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.
Beuer F; Sachs C; Groesser J; Gueth JF; Stimmelmayr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 26399980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
