BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061679)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of three quality rating instruments for systematic reviews of observational studies.
    Hootman JM; Driban JB; Sitler MR; Harris KP; Cattano NM
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Jun; 2(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 26061679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales.
    Oremus M; Oremus C; Hall GB; McKinnon MC;
    BMJ Open; 2012; 2(4):. PubMed ID: 22855629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers.
    Hartling L; Milne A; Hamm MP; Vandermeer B; Ansari M; Tsertsvadze A; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):982-93. PubMed ID: 23683848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of the Hayes Ability Screening Index in a sample of Australian prisoners.
    Young JT; van Dooren K; Lennox NG; Butler TG; Kinner SA
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2015 Nov; 59(11):1055-60. PubMed ID: 26018331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face validity and inter-rater reliability of the Danish version of the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale.
    Skovby P; Rask CU; Dall R; Aagaard H; Kronborg H
    Dan Med J; 2014 Jun; 61(6):A4853. PubMed ID: 24947624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of Observational Assessment Methods for Outcome-based Assessment of Surgical Skill: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.
    Groenier M; Brummer L; Bunting BP; Gallagher AG
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):189-201. PubMed ID: 31444148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter-rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database.
    Tooth L; Bennett S; McCluskey A; Hoffmann T; McKenna K; Lovarini M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Dec; 11(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 16364108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-rater reliability of three adult handwriting legibility instruments.
    Au EH; McCluskey A; Lannin NA
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2012 Oct; 59(5):347-54. PubMed ID: 22998512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three instruments assessing the quality of economic evaluations: a practical exercise on economic evaluations of the surgical treatment of obesity.
    Gerkens S; Crott R; Cleemput I; Thissen JP; Closon MC; Horsmans Y; Beguin C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 18601800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: validation of the QUACS scale.
    Wilke J; Krause F; Niederer D; Engeroff T; Nürnberger F; Vogt L; Banzer W
    J Anat; 2015 May; 226(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 25846130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills: a reliable and valid scoring system.
    van der Heide PA; van Toledo-Eppinga L; van der Heide M; van der Lee JH
    Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 16987590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ROBINS-I and the NOS had similar reliability but differed in applicability: A random sampling observational studies of systematic reviews/meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Huang L; Wang D; Ren P; Hong Q; Kang D
    J Evid Based Med; 2021 May; 14(2):112-122. PubMed ID: 34002466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new scale for the assessment of performance and capacity of hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: reliability and validity studies.
    Rosa-Rizzotto M; Visonà Dalla Pozza L; Corlatti A; Luparia A; Marchi A; Molteni F; Facchin P; Pagliano E; Fedrizzi E;
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Oct; 50(5):543-56. PubMed ID: 24732444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of a nutrition and physical activity environmental self-assessment for child care.
    Benjamin SE; Neelon B; Ball SC; Bangdiwala SI; Ammerman AS; Ward DS
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2007 Jul; 4():29. PubMed ID: 17615078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education.
    Cook DA; Reed DA
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1067-76. PubMed ID: 26107881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of two instruments for critical assessment of economic evaluations.
    Au F; Prahardhi S; Shiell A
    Value Health; 2008; 11(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 18489667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study examining inter- and intrarater reliability of three scales for measuring severity of psoriasis: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Physician's Global Assessment and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment.
    Berth-Jones J; Grotzinger K; Rainville C; Pham B; Huang J; Daly S; Herdman M; Firth P; Hotchkiss K
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Oct; 155(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 16965419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concerns for the reliability and validity of the National Stroke Project Stroke Severity Scale.
    El Husseini N; Shea KJ; Goldstein LB
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2011; 32(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 21986552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.