These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061888)

  • 1. Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian-Laird and alternative random-effects model meta-analyses - an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta-analyses.
    Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Awad T; Thabane L; Gluud C
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):238-53. PubMed ID: 26061888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: a simulation study.
    Novianti PW; Roes KC; van der Tweel I
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Jan; 37(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 24321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining study outcome measures using dominance adjusted weights.
    Makambi KH; Lu W
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Jun; 4(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 26053657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12 894 meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JP; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 26053175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).
    Romieu I; Gouveia N; Cifuentes LA; de Leon AP; Junger W; Vera J; Strappa V; Hurtado-Díaz M; Miranda-Soberanis V; Rojas-Bracho L; Carbajal-Arroyo L; Tzintzun-Cervantes G;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Oct; (171):5-86. PubMed ID: 23311234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
    Mathes T; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator.
    Böhning D; Malzahn U; Dietz E; Schlattmann P; Viwatwongkasem C; Biggeri A
    Biostatistics; 2002 Dec; 3(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 12933591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change.
    Cornell JE; Mulrow CD; Localio R; Stack CB; Meibohm AR; Guallar E; Goodman SN
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Feb; 160(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 24727843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do pooled estimates from orthodontic meta-analyses change depending on the meta-analysis approach? A meta-epidemiological study.
    Tatas Z; Koutsiouroumpa O; Seehra J; Mavridis D; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):722-730. PubMed ID: 37435902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
    Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis.
    Wiksten A; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2503-15. PubMed ID: 26842654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.