These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061977)

  • 1. Comparing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program With the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
    Weiss A; Anderson JE; Chang DC
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Aug; 150(8):815-6. PubMed ID: 26061977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the reliability of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a quality comparator.
    Rhoads KF; Wren SM
    JAMA Surg; 2014 May; 149(5):474. PubMed ID: 24623013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using procedural codes to supplement risk adjustment: a nonparametric learning approach.
    Syed Z; Rubinfeld I; Patton JH; Ritz J; Jordan J; Doud A; Velanovich V
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Jun; 212(6):1086-1093.e1. PubMed ID: 21493109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the Modified Frailty Index in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Program Database: Highlighting the Problem of Missing Data.
    Gani F; Canner JK; Pawlik TM
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Feb; 152(2):205-207. PubMed ID: 27784060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Pediatric NSQIP.
    Raval MV; Pawlik TM
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Aug; 153(8):764-765. PubMed ID: 29617521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.
    Cohen ME; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY; Zhou L; Huffman K; Wang X; Liu Y; Kraemer K; Meng X; Merkow R; Chow W; Matel B; Richards K; Hart AJ; Dimick JB; Hall BL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Aug; 217(2):336-46.e1. PubMed ID: 23628227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative morbidity and mortality after noncardiac surgery in young adults with congenital or early acquired heart disease: a retrospective cohort analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Maxwell BG; Wong JK; Lobato RL
    Am Surg; 2014 Apr; 80(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 24887660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases.
    Lapar DJ; Stukenborg GJ; Lau CL; Jones DR; Kozower BD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 22938777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A calculator for mortality following emergency general surgery based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Haskins IN; Maluso PJ; Schroeder ME; Amdur RL; Vaziri K; Agarwal S; Sarani B
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2017 Jun; 82(6):1094-1099. PubMed ID: 28328681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a beta phase report.
    Bruny JL; Hall BL; Barnhart DC; Billmire DF; Dias MS; Dillon PW; Fisher C; Heiss KF; Hennrikus WL; Ko CY; Moss L; Oldham KT; Richards KE; Shah R; Vinocur CD; Ziegler MM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Jan; 48(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23331796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgeon work captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program across specialties.
    Tang AB; Childers CP; Dworsky JQ; Maggard-Gibbons M
    Surgery; 2020 Mar; 167(3):550-555. PubMed ID: 31866059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the safety of nonemergent operative procedures performed at night? A study of 10,426 operations at an academic tertiary care hospital using the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality program improvement database.
    Turrentine FE; Wang H; Young JS; Calland JF
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 20699739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using electronic health records for surgical quality improvement in the era of big data.
    Anderson JE; Chang DC
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 25372451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery.
    Atherly A; Fink AS; Campbell DC; Mentzer RM; Henderson W; Khuri S; Culler SD
    Am J Surg; 2004 Nov; 188(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 15546571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Building Data Infrastructure to Evaluate and Improve Quality: The National Cancer Data Base and the Commission on Cancer's Quality Improvement Programs.
    Shulman LN; McCabe R; Gay G; Palis B; McKellar D
    J Oncol Pract; 2015 May; 11(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 25901051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative Adverse Events: Risk Adjustment for Procedure Complexity and Presence of Adhesions Is Crucial.
    Mavros MN; Bohnen JD; Ramly EP; Velmahos GC; Yeh DD; de Moya M; Fagenholz P; King DR; Lee J; Kaafarani HM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Aug; 221(2):345-53. PubMed ID: 26141463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morbidity, mortality, and readmission after vertebral augmentation: analysis of 850 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Toy JO; Basques BA; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(23):1943-9. PubMed ID: 25188603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement.
    Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Raval MV; Ko CY; Nathens AB; Hall BL
    Surgery; 2010 Aug; 148(2):217-38. PubMed ID: 20633727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of resident participation in surgical operations on postoperative outcomes: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Kiran RP; Ahmed Ali U; Coffey JC; Vogel JD; Pokala N; Fazio VW
    Ann Surg; 2012 Sep; 256(3):469-75. PubMed ID: 22842127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?
    Henderson WG; Daley J
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S19-27. PubMed ID: 19874930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.