These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061999)

  • 1. Generalization of trim and fill for application in meta-regression.
    Weinhandl ED; Duval S
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Mar; 3(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 26061999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses.
    Shi L; Lin L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15987. PubMed ID: 31169736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for publication bias using a bivariate trim and fill meta-analysis procedure.
    Luo C; Marks-Anglin A; Duan R; Lin L; Hong C; Chu H; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Aug; 41(18):3466-3478. PubMed ID: 35574857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting evidence on lung cancer and passive smoking: adjustment for publication bias by means of "trim and fill" algorithm.
    Takagi H; Sekino S; Kato T; Matsuno Y; Umemoto T
    Lung Cancer; 2006 Feb; 51(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 16386820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries.
    Huang A; Morikawa K; Friede T; Hattori S
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2089-2102. PubMed ID: 36602873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication bias in meta-analyses of the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for depression.
    Niemeyer H; Musch J; Pietrowsky R
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2013 Feb; 81(1):58-74. PubMed ID: 23244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-regression.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):19-42. PubMed ID: 27322495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with binary dependent effects.
    Tipton E
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Jun; 4(2):169-87. PubMed ID: 26053656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.