These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26061999)

  • 21. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions.
    Chaimani A; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 26062088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Duval S; Tweedie R
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10877304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hybrid test for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2881-2899. PubMed ID: 32290810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How effective is St John's wort? The evidence revisited.
    Werneke U; Horn O; Taylor DM
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2004 May; 65(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 15163246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter JR; Binder H; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 20656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating the price elasticity of beer: meta-analysis of data with heterogeneity, dependence, and publication bias.
    Nelson JP
    J Health Econ; 2014 Jan; 33():180-7. PubMed ID: 24362352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bias analysis and the simulation-extrapolation method for survival data with covariate measurement error under parametric proportional odds models.
    Yi GY; He W
    Biom J; 2012 May; 54(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 22685001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Structural Approach to Bias in Meta-analyses.
    Shrier I
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):223-37. PubMed ID: 26061887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Publication bias and time-trend bias in meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy: a re-analysis of Attewell, Glase and McFadden, 2001.
    Elvik R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1245-51. PubMed ID: 21376924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators.
    Lyles RH; Guo Y; Greenland S
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2012 Dec; 142(12):3235-3241. PubMed ID: 22962519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examining how meta-analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study.
    Bramley P; López-López JA; Higgins JPT
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):816-830. PubMed ID: 34327842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correcting covariate-dependent measurement error with non-zero mean.
    Parveen N; Moodie E; Brenner B
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(17):2786-2800. PubMed ID: 28393370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combining study outcome measures using dominance adjusted weights.
    Makambi KH; Lu W
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Jun; 4(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 26053657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian-Laird and alternative random-effects model meta-analyses - an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta-analyses.
    Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Awad T; Thabane L; Gluud C
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):238-53. PubMed ID: 26061888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.