These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26062008)

  • 1. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.
    Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1041-50. PubMed ID: 25872967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb; 16(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Beer A; Flacke F; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.
    Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Parkin CG
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 23439170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine.
    Zueger T; Schuler V; Stettler C; Diem P; Christ ER
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13631. PubMed ID: 22791566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of two updated blood glucose monitoring systems: an evaluation following ISO 15197:2013.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Jendrike N; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 May; 32(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 26809001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
    Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems.
    Pardo S; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1182-7. PubMed ID: 27118729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
    Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of home glucose meters in hypoglycemia.
    Sonmez A; Yilmaz Z; Uckaya G; Kilic S; Tapan S; Taslipinar A; Aydogdu A; Yazici M; Yilmaz MI; Serdar M; Erbil MK; Kutlu M
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Aug; 12(8):619-26. PubMed ID: 20615103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
    Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.
    Halldorsdottir S; Warchal-Windham ME; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.