These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26062088)

  • 1. Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions.
    Chaimani A; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 26062088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey.
    Souza JP; Pileggi C; Cecatti JG
    Reprod Health; 2007 Apr; 4():3. PubMed ID: 17437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias & small-study effects in pediatric dentistry meta-analyses.
    Papageorgiou SN; Dimitraki D; Coolidge T; Kotsanos N
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 15(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 25666576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The problem of natural funnel asymmetries: a simulation analysis of meta-analysis in macroeconomics.
    Callot L; Paldam M
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Jun; 2(2):84-102. PubMed ID: 26061677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
    Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Funnel plots may show asymmetry in the absence of publication bias with continuous outcomes dependent on baseline risk: presentation of a new publication bias test.
    Doleman B; Freeman SC; Lund JN; Williams JP; Sutton AJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):522-534. PubMed ID: 32362052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias.
    Hunter JP; Saratzis A; Sutton AJ; Boucher RH; Sayers RD; Bown MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 24794697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
    Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review.
    Page MJ; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Egger M
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 33166064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
    Egger M; Davey Smith G; Schneider M; Minder C
    BMJ; 1997 Sep; 315(7109):629-34. PubMed ID: 9310563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
    Zwetsloot PP; Van Der Naald M; Sena ES; Howells DW; IntHout J; De Groot JA; Chamuleau SA; MacLeod MR; Wever KE
    Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28884685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Barendregt JJ; Doi SAR
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Dec; 16(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 29621038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.