473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26062161)
1. Does emotional intelligence change during medical school gross anatomy course? Correlations with students' performance and team cohesion.
Holman MA; Porter SG; Pawlina W; Juskewitch JE; Lachman N
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 26062161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emotional intelligence, perceived stress and academic performance of Sri Lankan medical undergraduates.
Ranasinghe P; Wathurapatha WS; Mathangasinghe Y; Ponnamperuma G
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Feb; 17(1):41. PubMed ID: 28219419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emotional intelligence in medical students: does it correlate with selection measures?
Carr SE
Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1069-77. PubMed ID: 19874500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Anatomy Boot Camp on Students in a Medical Gross Anatomy Course.
Herling PJ; Mohseni BT; Hill DC; Chelf S; Rickert JA; Leo JT; Langley NR
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 27662606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship of emotional intelligence and capability of answering higher-order knowledge questions in physiology among first-year medical students.
Mondal H; Mondal S; Singh A; Kumari A; Pinjar MJ; Juhi A; Nath S; Dhanvijay AKD; Kumari A; Gupta P
Adv Physiol Educ; 2024 Jun; 48(2):407-413. PubMed ID: 38545641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A survey-based study of emotional intelligence as it relates to gender and academic performance of medical students.
Aithal AP; Kumar N; Gunasegeran P; Sundaram SM; Rong LZ; Prabhu SP
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2016; 29(3):255-258. PubMed ID: 28406111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy.
Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does learning in clinical context in anatomical sciences improve examination results, learning motivation, or learning orientation?
Böckers A; Mayer C; Böckers TM
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23733503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved medical student perception of ultrasound using a paired anatomy teaching assistant and clinician teaching model.
Smith JP; Kendall JL; Royer DF
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):175-184. PubMed ID: 28817242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive load imposed by ultrasound-facilitated teaching does not adversely affect gross anatomy learning outcomes.
Jamniczky HA; Cotton D; Paget M; Ramji Q; Lenz R; McLaughlin K; Coderre S; Ma IW
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 27533319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration of geriatrics into a spiral undergraduate medical curriculum in Pakistan: evaluation and feedback of third-year medical students.
Sabzwari SR; Bhanji S; Zuberi RW
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2011 Dec; 24(3):622. PubMed ID: 22267358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Safe Harbor": evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course.
Spampinato CM; Wittich CM; Beckman TJ; Cha SS; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24039220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emotional intelligence assessment in a graduate entry medical school curriculum.
Doherty EM; Cronin PA; Offiah G
BMC Med Educ; 2013 Mar; 13():38. PubMed ID: 23497237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
