These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2606273)

  • 1. A controlled clinical study of amalgam restorations: survival, failures, and causes of failure.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    Dent Mater; 1989 Mar; 5(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 2606273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist J; Qvist V; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Oct; 48(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 2251918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term evaluation and rerestoration of amalgam restorations.
    Akerboom HB; Advokaat JG; Van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Feb; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 8432106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Replacement reasons and service time of class-II amalgam restorations in relation to cavity design.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1991 Apr; 49(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 2053429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.
    Collins CJ; Bryant RW; Hodge KL
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 9611936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: a clinical survey.
    McDaniel RJ; Davis RD; Murchison DF; Cohen RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Feb; 131(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 10680384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 1437690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations for Class I cavities and Class II. Part II: Cause analysis of unacceptable restorations].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Jan; 39(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2623712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist V; Thylstrup A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Dec; 44(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 3469862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial.
    Letzel H
    J Dent; 1989; 17 Suppl 1():S10-7; discussion S26-8. PubMed ID: 2659634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.