These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2606273)

  • 21. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents.
    van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Mjör IA; Qvist V
    J Dent; 1997 Jan; 25(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9080736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth.
    Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; D'Hoore W; Carvalho J; Qvist V
    J Dent; 2003 Aug; 31(6):395-405. PubMed ID: 12878022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A survey of amalgam restorations in a south-western Nigerian population.
    Oginni AO; Olusile AO
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Mar; 29(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11896848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jan; 6(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10752459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of the condensation instrument on the clinical behaviour of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Mar; 14(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3470463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical assessments of dental amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Marantz RL
    Int Dent J; 1980 Dec; 30(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 6935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months.
    Browning WD; Johnson WW; Gregory PN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 May; 131(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 10832254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.