These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2606275)

  • 1. Properties of prosthetic resin-veneer materials processed in commercial laboratories.
    Berge M
    Dent Mater; 1989 Mar; 5(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 2606275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porosity of resin veneer materials.
    Berge M; Hegdahl T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1987 Oct; 45(5):321-8. PubMed ID: 3314314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hardness and fracture toughness of four commercial visible light-cured composite resin veneering materials.
    Yamaga T; Sato Y; Akagawa Y; Taira M; Wakasa K; Yamaki M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Dec; 22(12):857-63. PubMed ID: 9217297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the physical properties of four prosthetic veneering materials.
    Jones RM; Goodacre CJ; Moore BK; Dykema RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 2915331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of microfilled and visible light-cured composite resins.
    Raptis CN; Fan PL; Powers JM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Oct; 99(4):631-3. PubMed ID: 292720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 May; 25(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 9639160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems.
    Ali IL; Yunus N; Abu-Hassan MI
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 18761582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Studies on physical properties of light cured veneer resin].
    Kato Y; Tamanaha S; Ohkawa S; Yoshida K; Fujioka M; Nagasawa T; Tsuru H
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1986 Dec; 18(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 3504867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.
    Kao EC; Eliades T; Rezvan E; Johnston WM
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 8682171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal fit of porcelain and indirect composite laminate veneers under in vitro conditions.
    Harasani MH; Isidor F; Kaaber S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Jun; 99(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 1871536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of high intensity vs. soft-start halogen irradiation on light-cured resin-based composites. Part II: Hardness and solubility.
    Hofmann N; Markert T; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 15241908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in degree of conversion and microhardness of dental resin cements.
    Yan YL; Kim YK; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 20420064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear strength of laboratory-processed composite resins bonded to a silane-coated nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy.
    Kolodney H; Puckett AD; Brown K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 1507115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creep of resin veneer materials.
    Berge M
    Dent Mater; 1988 Jun; 4(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3268483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of light-curing units and restorative materials on the micro hardness of resin cements.
    Kuguimiya RN; Alves LB; Seabra FR; Sarmento CF; Santos AJ; Machado CT
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 20427907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of ceramic veneer opacity and exposure time on the polymerization efficiency of resin cements.
    Archegas LR; de Menezes Caldas DB; Rached rN; Soares P; Souza EM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 22313282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specimen aspect ratio and light transmission in photoactive dental resins.
    Hadis MA; Shortall AC; Palin WM
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1154-61. PubMed ID: 22947442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.