412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26063719)
1. Discordant Syphilis Immunoassays in Pregnancy: Perinatal Outcomes and Implications for Clinical Management.
Mmeje O; Chow JM; Davidson L; Shieh J; Schapiro JM; Park IU
Clin Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 61(7):1049-53. PubMed ID: 26063719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for syphilis with the treponemal immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and implications for clinical management.
Park IU; Chow JM; Bolan G; Stanley M; Shieh J; Schapiro JM
J Infect Dis; 2011 Nov; 204(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 21930610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abbott ARCHITECT Syphilis TP Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Accurately Diagnoses Past or Current Syphilis in Pregnancy.
Adhikari EH; Frame IJ; Hill E; Fatabhoy R; Strickland AL; Cavuoti D; McIntire DD; Hollaway RM
Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jan; 37(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31905408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of sera with discordant results from reverse sequence screening for syphilis.
Lee K; Park H; Roh EY; Shin S; Park KU; Park MH; Song EY
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():269347. PubMed ID: 23509699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.
Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Syphilis Immunoassay Signal Strength Correlates with Active Infection in Pregnant Women.
Zofkie AC; Seasely AR; Gaffney D; Rogers VL; Mcintire DD; Roberts SW; Adhikari EH
Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):671-678. PubMed ID: 31910464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection.
Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating congenital syphilis in a reverse sequence testing environment.
Chen MW; Akinboyo IC; Sue PK; Donohue PK; Ghanem KG; Detrick B; Witter FR; Page KR; Arav-Boger R; Golden WC
J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):956-963. PubMed ID: 31076626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of a dual non-treponemal/treponemal syphilis point-of-care test to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
Owusu-Edusei K; Gift TL; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Nov; 38(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21992974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving syphilis screening in deceased organ donors.
Theodoropoulos N; Jaramillo A; Penugonda S; Wasik C; Brooks K; Ladner DP; Jendrisak MD; Ison MG
Transplantation; 2015 Feb; 99(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 25073035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of isolated reactive treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay results.
Hunter MG; Robertson PW; Post JJ
J Infect Dis; 2013 May; 207(9):1416-23. PubMed ID: 22869911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening and Discordant Results in Pregnancy.
Williams JEP; Bazan JA; Turner AN; Thung SF; Hanlon C; Pettus TR; Sánchez PJ
J Pediatr; 2020 Apr; 219():263-266.e1. PubMed ID: 32093931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of age, gender, and pregnancy on syphilis screening using the Captia Syphilis-G assay.
Henrich TJ; Yawetz S
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1126-30. PubMed ID: 22082723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a Multiplex Fully Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal (Rapid Plasma Reagin) Assay.
Arbefeville S; Lynch M; Ferrieri P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jul; 152(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 31139835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Assessment of the congenital syphilis prevention programs].
Daoud M; Duca E; Onofriescu M; Petrescu Z
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2011; 115(3):934-7. PubMed ID: 22046811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of different confirmatory algorithms using seven treponemal tests on Architect Syphilis TP-positive/RPR-negative sera.
Jonckheere S; Berth M; Van Esbroeck M; Blomme S; Lagrou K; Padalko E
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2041-8. PubMed ID: 26187433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total With Automated Rapid Plasma Reagin: Experience From a Tertiary Medical Center.
Tang EW; Paiva KJ; Pytel-Parenteau DL; Maynard MA; Chan PA; Lu S
Sex Transm Dis; 2020 May; 47(5):301-305. PubMed ID: 32073549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
