These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2606410)

  • 1. The maximization test for skin sensitization potential--updating the standard protocol and validation of a modified protocol.
    Maurer T; Hess R
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1989 Dec; 27(12):807-11. PubMed ID: 2606410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of guinea pig sensitization methods.
    Fahr H; Noster U; Schulz KH
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 1032127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive evaluation in animals of the contact allergenic potential of medically important substances. I. Comparison of different methods of inducing and measuring cutaneous sensitization.
    Maurer T; Thomann P; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Dec; 4(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 738037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for skin sensitization according to the notification procedure for new chemicals: the Magnusson and Kligman test.
    Schlede E; Eppler R
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Jan; 32(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7720363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of three guinea-pig sensitization procedures for the detection of 19 reported human contact sensitizers.
    Goodwin BF; Crevel RW; Johnson AW
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Sep; 7(5):248-58. PubMed ID: 7307480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximization test.
    Kligman AM; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Mar; 32(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7774182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.
    Frankild S; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE; Andersen KE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 11028857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitization and testing of guinea pigs with nickel sulfate.
    Wahlberg JE
    Dermatologica; 1976; 152(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 964426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The optimization test in the guinea-pig. A method for the predictive evaluation of the contact allergenicity of chemicals.
    Maurer T; Thomann P; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Agents Actions; 1975 May; 5(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 1155304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method for assessment of experimental allergy in guinea pigs adapted to cosmetic ingredients.
    Dossou KG; Sicard C; Kalopissis G; Reymond D; Schaefer H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):226-34. PubMed ID: 4085222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental sensitization of guinea pigs by drugs. Comparison of the maximization test with the wholly intradermal test.
    Rantuccio F; Coviello C; Sinisi D; Scardigno A; Conte A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Nov; 9(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 6653105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST).
    Gad SC; Dunn BJ; Dobbs DW; Reilly C; Walsh RD
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1986 Jun; 84(1):93-114. PubMed ID: 3715870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The optimization test in the guinea pig in relation to other predictive sensitization methods.
    Maurer T; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Toxicology; 1980; 15(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 7466830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive evaluation in animals of the contact allergenic potential of medically important substances. II. Comparison of different methods of cutaneous sensitization with "weak" allergens.
    Maurer T; Thomann P; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Jan; 5(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 421455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
    Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization.
    Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL
    Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
    Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The epicutaneous maximization test.
    Guillot JP; Gonnet JF
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1985; 14():220-47. PubMed ID: 4064747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
    Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
    Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.