These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26064181)

  • 1. A 2D Markerless Gait Analysis Methodology: Validation on Healthy Subjects.
    Castelli A; Paolini G; Cereatti A; Della Croce U
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():186780. PubMed ID: 26064181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Markerless motion capture can provide reliable 3D gait kinematics in the sagittal and frontal plane.
    Sandau M; Koblauch H; Moeslund TB; Aanæs H; Alkjær T; Simonsen EB
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1168-75. PubMed ID: 25085672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications of markerless motion capture in gait recognition.
    Sandau M
    Dan Med J; 2016 Mar; 63(3):. PubMed ID: 26931198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computational model for dynamic analysis of the human gait.
    Vimieiro C; Andrada E; Witte H; Pinotti M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 24156601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A markerless estimation of the ankle-foot complex 2D kinematics during stance.
    Surer E; Cereatti A; Grosso E; Della Croce U
    Gait Posture; 2011 Apr; 33(4):532-7. PubMed ID: 21295984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the accuracy of open-source pose estimation methods for measuring gait kinematics.
    Washabaugh EP; Shanmugam TA; Ranganathan R; Krishnan C
    Gait Posture; 2022 Sep; 97():188-195. PubMed ID: 35988434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gait Kinematic Analysis in Water Using Wearable Inertial Magnetic Sensors.
    Fantozzi S; Giovanardi A; Borra D; Gatta G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138105. PubMed ID: 26368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters.
    Szczerbik E; Kalinowska M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 22098124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliable sagittal plane kinematic gait assessments are feasible using low-cost webcam technology.
    Saner RJ; Washabaugh EP; Krishnan C
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jul; 56():19-23. PubMed ID: 28482201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture.
    Kanko RM; Laende EK; Davis EM; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ
    J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110665. PubMed ID: 34380101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of passive elastic joint moment-angle relationships in the lower extremity.
    Silder A; Whittington B; Heiderscheit B; Thelen DG
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2628-35. PubMed ID: 17359981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional kinematics of an unconstrained ankle arthroplasty: a preliminary in vivo videofluoroscopic feasibility study.
    List R; Foresti M; Gerber H; Goldhahn J; Rippstein P; Stüssi E
    Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Oct; 33(10):883-92. PubMed ID: 23050714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.
    El Habachi A; Moissenet F; Duprey S; Cheze L; Dumas R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Jul; 53(7):655-67. PubMed ID: 25783762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sagittal subtalar and talocrural joint assessment with weight-bearing fluoroscopy during barefoot ambulation.
    McHenry BD; Exten EL; Long J; Law B; Marks RM; Harris G
    Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Apr; 36(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 25380773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture technologies through simultaneous data collection during gait: proof of concept.
    Ceseracciu E; Sawacha Z; Cobelli C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e87640. PubMed ID: 24595273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-laboratory consistency of gait analysis measurements.
    Benedetti MG; Merlo A; Leardini A
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):934-9. PubMed ID: 23711987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization.
    Duprey S; Cheze L; Dumas R
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2858-62. PubMed ID: 20701914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematic models of lower limb joints for musculo-skeletal modelling and optimization in gait analysis.
    Leardini A; Belvedere C; Nardini F; Sancisi N; Conconi M; Parenti-Castelli V
    J Biomech; 2017 Sep; 62():77-86. PubMed ID: 28601242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint-level mechanics of the walk-to-run transition in humans.
    Pires NJ; Lay BS; Rubenson J
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Oct; 217(Pt 19):3519-27. PubMed ID: 25104752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.