These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26064572)

  • 1. Graphlet signature-based scoring method to estimate protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Singh O; Sawariya K; Aparoy P
    R Soc Open Sci; 2014 Dec; 1(4):140306. PubMed ID: 26064572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures.
    Sonmez AB; Can T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 4):135. PubMed ID: 28361704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graphlet characteristics in directed networks.
    Trpevski I; Dimitrova T; Boshkovski T; Stikov N; Kocarev L
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37057. PubMed ID: 27830769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative network analysis via differential graphlet communities.
    Wong SW; Cercone N; Jurisica I
    Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 15(2-3):608-17. PubMed ID: 25283527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of human disease genes from interactome network using graphlet interaction.
    Wang XD; Huang JL; Yang L; Wei DQ; Qi YX; Jiang ZL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86142. PubMed ID: 24465923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graphlet Laplacians for topology-function and topology-disease relationships.
    Windels SFL; Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5226-5234. PubMed ID: 31192358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IncGraph: Incremental graphlet counting for topology optimisation.
    Cannoodt R; Ruyssinck J; Ramon J; De Preter K; Saeys Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195997. PubMed ID: 29698494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Graphlet-Based Topological Characterization of the Resting-State Network in Healthy People.
    Finotelli P; Piccardi C; Miglio E; Dulio P
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():665544. PubMed ID: 33994939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graphlet-based measures are suitable for biological network comparison.
    Hayes W; Sun K; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 23349212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution.
    Przulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e177-83. PubMed ID: 17237089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing sixteen scoring functions for predicting biological activities of ligands for protein targets.
    Xu W; Lucke AJ; Fairlie DP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Apr; 57():76-88. PubMed ID: 25682361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
    Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncovering biological network function via graphlet degree signatures.
    Milenković T; Przulj N
    Cancer Inform; 2008; 6():257-73. PubMed ID: 19259413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.
    Liu J; Su M; Liu Z; Li J; Li Y; Wang R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28720122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural basis of binding of high-affinity ligands to protein kinase C: prediction of the binding modes through a new molecular dynamics method and evaluation by site-directed mutagenesis.
    Pak Y; Enyedy IJ; Varady J; Kung JW; Lorenzo PS; Blumberg PM; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2001 May; 44(11):1690-701. PubMed ID: 11356104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.