228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26065465)
1. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Celik S; Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 26065465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Halicioglu K; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Ucar FI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 24182585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Asymmetries in Adult Patients With Different Skeletal Classes and Vertical Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Mendoza LV; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; García-Sanz V; Almerich-Silla JM; Paredes-Gallardo V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12319. PubMed ID: 30120301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients and a normal occlusion sample.
Uysal T; Sisman Y; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 19577146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical growth pattern as a determinant of mandibular asymmetry.
Habib M; Ahsan T; Majeed O; Faheem F
Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(5):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 35799725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of early bilateral mandibular first molar extraction on condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry.
Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Caglaroglu M; Buyuk SK; Akkas I; Sekerci AE
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1557-61. PubMed ID: 23001188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of mandibular posterior vertical asymmetry index in panoramic radiography compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lim YS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):558-567. PubMed ID: 29602348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular asymmetry in cleft lip and palate patients.
Kurt G; Bayram M; Uysal T; Ozer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 19734371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal malocclusions and vertical patterns in adult individuals: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Alhazmi N
J Orthod Sci; 2023; 12():33. PubMed ID: 37351397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in different skeletal patterns with cone-beam CT].
Li WY; Chen WJ; Hou W; Qin JW; Duan YF; Mu JQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 32274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Mandibular Asymmetry in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.
Paknahad M; Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Beladi AS; Khojastepour L
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):919-924. PubMed ID: 27441699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between unilateral posterior crossbite and mandibular asymmetry during late adolescence.
Lopatienė K; Trumpytė K
Stomatologija; 2018; 20(3):90-95. PubMed ID: 30531163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A three-dimensional analysis of skeletal and dental characteristics in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry.
Yu J; Hu Y; Huang M; Chen J; Ding X; Zheng L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):449-462. PubMed ID: 29562577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between condylar position and vertical skeletal craniofacial morphology: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Paknahad M; Shahidi S
Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):740-751. PubMed ID: 29111131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of associations between condylar morphology, ramus height, and mandibular plane angle in various vertical skeletal patterns: a digital radiographic study.
Türker G; Öztürk Yaşar M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):330. PubMed ID: 35941596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology and Facial Asymmetry in Individuals with Different Vertical Skeletal Growth Patterns.
Diwakar R; Bucci R; Kaushik A; Bansal A; Bucci P; Kochhar AS; Spagnuolo G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of early unilateral mandibular first molar extraction on condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry.
Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Candirli C
Eur J Dent; 2014 Apr; 8(2):178-183. PubMed ID: 24966767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
