These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26065633)

  • 1. Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.
    Stone ER; Gabard AR; Groves AE; Lipkus IM
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(10):1230-41. PubMed ID: 26065633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.
    Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W; Wilkins AM; Boker EM; MacDonald Gibson J
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):612-628. PubMed ID: 27862121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probability Size Matters: The Effect of Foreground-Only versus Foreground+Background Graphs on Risk Aversion Diminishes with Larger Probabilities.
    Okan Y; Stone ER; Parillo J; Bruine de Bruin W; Parker AM
    Risk Anal; 2020 Apr; 40(4):771-788. PubMed ID: 31907975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Exe NL; Kahn VC; Dickson M
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):e106. PubMed ID: 22832208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.
    Galesic M; Garcia-Retamero R; Gigerenzer G
    Health Psychol; 2009 Mar; 28(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 19290713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools.
    Kurz-Milcke E; Gigerenzer G; Martignon L
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():18-28. PubMed ID: 18469211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designing Graphs that Promote Both Risk Understanding and Behavior Change.
    Okan Y; Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W
    Risk Anal; 2018 May; 38(5):929-946. PubMed ID: 28973820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The visual communication of risk.
    Lipkus IM; Hollands JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1999; (25):149-63. PubMed ID: 10854471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving risk understanding across ability levels: Encouraging active processing with dynamic icon arrays.
    Okan Y; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Maldonado A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Jun; 21(2):178-94. PubMed ID: 25938975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Dickson M; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Kahn VC; Exe NL; Valerio M; Holtzman LG; Scherer LD; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 24246564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of numeracy on reactions to different graphic risk presentation formats: An experimental analogue study.
    Wright AJ; Whitwell SC; Takeichi C; Hankins M; Marteau TM
    Br J Health Psychol; 2009 Feb; 14(Pt 1):107-25. PubMed ID: 18442447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactive graphics for expressing health risks: development and qualitative evaluation.
    Ancker JS; Chan C; Kukafka R
    J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):461-75. PubMed ID: 19657926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rational numbers: componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task.
    Meert G; Grégoire J; Noël MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1598-616. PubMed ID: 19123119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overcoming the knowledge-behavior gap: The effect of evidence-based HPV vaccination leaflets on understanding, intention, and actual vaccination decision.
    Wegwarth O; Kurzenhäuser-Carstens S; Gigerenzer G
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(12):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24486360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE WITH APPLICATIONS IN SUSCEPTIBLE-INFECTIOUS-SUSCEPTIBLE MODELS.
    Ilea M; Turnea M; Arotăriţei D; Rotariu M; Popescu M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 26204675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphical approaches to the analysis of safety data from clinical trials.
    Amit O; Heiberger RM; Lane PW
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):20-35. PubMed ID: 17323410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graphical tactile displays for visually-impaired people.
    Vidal-Verdú F; Hafez M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Mar; 15(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 17436884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.