These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2606609)

  • 1. Effects of age, brain damage, and task complexity on the sensitivity of reaction time to the delay between the warning signal and the stimulus.
    Bruyer R; Coyette F; Wyns C
    Int J Neurosci; 1989 Nov; 49(1-2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2606609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of spatial orientation on attention reaction time during pointing movement towards visual direction].
    Gueye L; Viallet F; Legallet E; Trouche E
    Dakar Med; 1998; 43(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 10797953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Level of uncertainty and brain damage: a reaction time test of attention for clinical use.
    Wyns C; Bruyer R
    Int J Neurosci; 1988 Jun; 40(3-4):153-65. PubMed ID: 3403167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interhemispheric neural summation in the split brain: effects of stimulus colour and task.
    Roser M; Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(7):830-46. PubMed ID: 12631533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of frontal or temporal lobectomy on the use of advance information in a choice reaction time task.
    Alivisatos B; Milner B
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 2733822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and brain damage: a clinical study of response latency under various degrees of uncertainty.
    Wyns C; Coyette F; Bruyer R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 2928036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crowdsourced Measurement of Reaction Times to Audiovisual Stimuli With Various Degrees of Asynchrony.
    Bazilinskyy P; Winter J
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1192-1206. PubMed ID: 30036098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal?
    Farah MJ; Wong AB; Monheit MA; Morrow LA
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 2733819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance.
    Stuss DT; Stethem LL; Hugenholtz H; Picton T; Pivik J; Richard MT
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 52(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 2746267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction time in ambulant multiple sclerosis patients. Part II. Influence of task complexity.
    Jennekens-Schinkel A; Sanders EA; Lanser JB; Van der Velde EA
    J Neurol Sci; 1988 Jun; 85(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 3385434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial attention in the mental architecture: evidence from neuropsychology.
    Behrmann M; Black SE; Murji S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Apr; 17(2):220-42. PubMed ID: 7629269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a generalized right hemisphere dominance for mediating cerebral activation? Evidence from a choice reaction experiment with lateralized simple warning stimuli.
    Sturm W; Reul J; Willmes K
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(5):747-51. PubMed ID: 2739898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interhemispheric neural summation in the split brain with symmetrical and asymmetrical displays.
    Roser M; Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1300-12. PubMed ID: 11931933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anticipatory postural adjustments during step initiation: elicitation by auditory stimulation of differing intensities.
    Delval A; Dujardin K; Tard C; Devanne H; Willart S; Bourriez JL; Derambure P; Defebvre L
    Neuroscience; 2012 Sep; 219():166-74. PubMed ID: 22626643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-response compatibility and response preparation: effects on motor component of information processing for upper and lower limb responses.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 16491672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception-response speed and driving capabilities of brain-damaged and older drivers.
    Korteling JE
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 2376411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous performance test and schizophrenia: a test of stimulus-response compatibility, working memory, response readiness, or none of the above?
    Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Suter JC; Goldberg TE
    Am J Psychiatry; 2000 May; 157(5):772-80. PubMed ID: 10784471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.