451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26067190)
1. A novel zernike application to differentiate between three-dimensional corneal thickness of normal corneas and corneas with keratoconus.
Shetty R; Matalia H; Srivatsa P; Ghosh A; Dupps WJ; Sinha Roy A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 160(3):453-462.e2. PubMed ID: 26067190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam.
Xu Z; Li W; Jiang J; Zhuang X; Chen W; Peng M; Wang J; Lu F; Shen M; Wang Y
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16486. PubMed ID: 29184086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of the Efficacy of the Cone Location and Magnitude Index in the Diagnosis of Keratoconus.
Kocamış Sİ; Çakmak HB; Çağıl N; Toklu Y
Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 24840348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations.
Bühren J; Kühne C; Kohnen T
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 17317387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 28647782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subclinical keratoconus detection with three-dimensional (3-D) morphogeometric and volumetric analysis.
Toprak I; Cavas F; Velázquez JS; Alio Del Barrio JL; Alio JL
Acta Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 98(8):e933-e942. PubMed ID: 32410342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive Analysis Between Topographic, Pachymetric and Wavefront Parameters in Keratoconus, Suspects and Normal Eyes: Creating Unified Equations to Evaluate Keratoconus.
Prakash G; Suhail M; Srivastava D
Curr Eye Res; 2016; 41(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25803133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus.
Tummanapalli SS; Potluri H; Vaddavalli PK; Sangwan VS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2205-14. PubMed ID: 26703297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.
Jafarinasab MR; Feizi S; Karimian F; Hasanpour H
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013; 23(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 23335313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Morphogeometric and Volumetric Characterization of Cornea in Pediatric Patients With Early Keratoconus.
Toprak I; Cavas F; Velázquez JS; Alió Del Barrio JL; Alió JL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 222():102-111. PubMed ID: 32971022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study and characterization of morphogeometric parameters to assist diagnosis of keratoconus.
Cavas-Martínez F; Fernández-Pacheco DG; Parras D; Cañavate FJF; Bataille L; Alió J
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Nov; 17(Suppl 1):161. PubMed ID: 30458789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes.
Reddy JC; Rapuano CJ; Cater JR; Suri K; Nagra PK; Hammersmith KM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 24680519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early, Forme Fruste keratoconus and normal thin cornea, evaluation of sensitive parameters by combined Placido Scheimpflug topography.
Gharieb HM; Abdelatif MK; Gharieb HM; Othman IS
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 37731321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].
Li J; Jing LL; Du XL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 56(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 32842328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in central and non-central keratoconus, and their effect on the objective screening thresholds for keratoconus.
Prakash G; Srivastava D; Choudhuri S; Thirumalai SM; Bacero R
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 94(2):e118-29. PubMed ID: 26523841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus.
Golan O; Hwang ES; Lang P; Santhiago MR; Abulafia A; Touboul D; Krauthammer M; Smadja D
J Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(10):664-670. PubMed ID: 30296327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
