These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26067530)

  • 1. Guidance toward and away from distractors in repeated visual search.
    Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):12. PubMed ID: 26067530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching the same display twice: Properties of short-term memory in repeated search.
    Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):335-52. PubMed ID: 24306982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search.
    Drew T; Boettcher SEP; Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2017 Sep; 17(11):5. PubMed ID: 28892812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit short- and long-term memory direct our gaze in visual search.
    Kruijne W; Meeter M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):761-73. PubMed ID: 26754811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fate of distractors in working memory: No evidence for their active removal.
    Dagry I; Barrouillet P
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():129-138. PubMed ID: 28886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target.
    Burt JS; Jolley J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 28646419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.
    Yang H; Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 19304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements.
    Hilchey MD; Antinucci V; Lamy D; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):506-514. PubMed ID: 30796630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Target features and target-distractor relation are both primed in visual search.
    Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 24415176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memory load affects visual search processes without influencing search efficiency.
    Solman GJ; Allan Cheyne J; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(10):1185-91. PubMed ID: 21426915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.
    Zelinsky GJ; Peng Y; Berg AC; Samaras D
    J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(3):30. PubMed ID: 24105460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.
    Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):8.1-13. PubMed ID: 20053071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.
    Körner C; Gilchrist ID
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):846-51. PubMed ID: 18087948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.
    Marini F; Scott J; Aron AR; Ester EF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28439791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual Search: How Do We Find What We Are Looking For?
    Wolfe JM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2020 Sep; 6():539-562. PubMed ID: 32320631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes.
    Spotorno S; Malcolm GL; Tatler BW
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.