These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26067530)

  • 41. Contrasting episodic and template-based guidance during search through natural scenes.
    Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):523-536. PubMed ID: 30920285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.
    Guo Z; Niu M; Wang Q
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7560. PubMed ID: 33828108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Explicit awareness supports conditional visual search in the retrieval guidance paradigm.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Hahn S; Thomas RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():44-53. PubMed ID: 24291120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Visual search in the real world: evidence for the formation of distractor representations.
    Howard CJ; Pharaon RG; Körner C; Smith AD; Gilchrist ID
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1143-53. PubMed ID: 22308885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of interference on short-term memory for visual orientation.
    Rademaker RL; Bloem IM; De Weerd P; Sack AT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1650-65. PubMed ID: 26371383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory.
    Burke MR; Allen RJ; Gonzalez C
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):803-18. PubMed ID: 23155732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control.
    Olson IR; Moore KS; Drowos DB
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1360-9. PubMed ID: 18927049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Target selection biases from recent experience transfer across effectors.
    Moher J; Song JH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 26563393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Working memory is corrupted by strategic changes in search templates.
    Kong G; Meehan J; Fougnie D
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):3. PubMed ID: 32744619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit memory: Evidence that masked repetition priming speeds the onset of recollection.
    Park JL; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():8-16. PubMed ID: 27291494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using a model of hypothesis generation to predict eye movements in a visual search task.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Thomas RP; Dougherty MR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 25231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Visual consciousness and intertrial feature priming.
    Peremen Z; Hilo R; Lamy D
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23547103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
    Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.