These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26067742)

  • 21. Response of Thoraco-Abdominal Tissue in High-Rate Compression.
    Seifert J; Koser J; Shah AS; Frazer LL; Yoganandan N; Shender BS; Sheehy JB; Paskoff G; Bentley T; Nicolella DP; Stemper BD
    J Biomech Eng; 2023 Mar; 145(3):. PubMed ID: 36301262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constant strain rate compression of bovine cortical bone on the Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar.
    Bekker A; Cloete TJ; Chinsamy-Turan A; Nurick GN; Kok S
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Jan; 46():443-9. PubMed ID: 25492009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Material characterization and simulation for soft gels subjected to impulsive loading.
    Tan XG; Chen Y; O'Shaughnessy TJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105293. PubMed ID: 35689989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a True-Biaxial Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Device and Its Application.
    Pang S; Tao W; Liang Y; Huan S; Liu Y; Chen J
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Nov; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 34885468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic Compressive Mechanical Properties of UR50 Ultra-Early-Strength Cement-Based Concrete Material under High Strain Rate on SHPB Test.
    Wang W; Zhang Z; Huo Q; Song X; Yang J; Wang X; Wang J; Wang X
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Sep; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 36079535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using the split Hopkinson pressure bar to validate material models.
    Church P; Cornish R; Cullis I; Gould P; Lewtas I
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2014 Aug; 372(2023):20130294. PubMed ID: 25071238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental Investigation on the Influence of Wave Impedance on Dynamic Mechanical Response of Granites undergone High Temperature.
    Li W; Fang S; Gao X
    ACS Omega; 2023 Nov; 8(45):42398-42408. PubMed ID: 38024682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hyperelastic compressive mechanical properties of the subcalcaneal soft tissue: An inverse finite element analysis.
    Isvilanonda V; Iaquinto JM; Pai S; Mackenzie-Helnwein P; Ledoux WR
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1186-1191. PubMed ID: 27040391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling the biomechanical and injury response of human liver parenchyma under tensile loading.
    Untaroiu CD; Lu YC; Siripurapu SK; Kemper AR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Jan; 41():280-91. PubMed ID: 25092147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical Response of Porcine Liver Tissue under High Strain Rate Compression.
    Chen J; Patnaik SS; Prabhu RK; Priddy LB; Bouvard JL; Marin E; Horstemeyer MF; Liao J; Williams LN
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2019 May; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 31151177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Influence of the Strain Rate and Prestatic Stress on the Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Sandstone-A Case Study from China.
    Wang J; Ren Z; Yang S; Ning J; Zhang S; Bian Y
    Materials (Basel); 2023 May; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 37176473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Compressive mechanical characterization of non-human primate spinal cord white matter.
    Jannesar S; Allen M; Mills S; Gibbons A; Bresnahan JC; Salegio EA; Sparrey CJ
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Jul; 74():260-269. PubMed ID: 29729417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical characterization of porcine liver properties for computational simulation of indentation on cancerous tissue.
    Yang Y; Li K; Sommer G; Yung KL; Holzapfel GA
    Math Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 37(4):469-490. PubMed ID: 32424396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A fibre-reinforced poroviscoelastic model accurately describes the biomechanical behaviour of the rat Achilles tendon.
    Khayyeri H; Gustafsson A; Heuijerjans A; Matikainen MK; Julkunen P; Eliasson P; Aspenberg P; Isaksson H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126869. PubMed ID: 26030436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human liver finite element model validation using compressive and tensile experimental data - biomed 2013.
    Davis ML; Moreno DP; Vavalle NA; Gayzik FS
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2013; 49():289-96. PubMed ID: 23686212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of photon Doppler velocimetry to direct impact Hopkinson pressure bars.
    Lea LJ; Jardine AP
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2016 Feb; 87(2):023101. PubMed ID: 26931828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifiability of soft tissue constitutive parameters from in-vivo macro-indentation.
    Oddes Z; Solav D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105708. PubMed ID: 36801779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tensile Mechanical Properties and Dynamic Constitutive Model of Polyurea Elastomer under Different Strain Rates.
    Chen Y; Guo H; Sun M; Lv X
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Aug; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36080652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The behavior of cancellous bone from quasi-static to dynamic strain rates with emphasis on the intermediate regime.
    Prot M; Cloete TJ; Saletti D; Laporte S
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1050-1057. PubMed ID: 26970887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic and quasi-static compressive response of porcine muscle.
    Song B; Chen W; Ge Y; Weerasooriya T
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(13):2999-3005. PubMed ID: 17448479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.