269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26067861)
1. Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.
Billingsley CC; Jacobson SN; Crafton SM; Crim AK; Li Q; Hade EM; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; Salani R; Backes FJ; O'Malley DM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Sep; 25(7):1331-6. PubMed ID: 26067861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
Whitworth JM; Matthews KS; Shipman KA; Numnum TM; Kendrick JE; Kilgore LC; Straughn JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Mar; 112(3):601-4. PubMed ID: 19110303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A single-arm, retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia using same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.
Eckstrom J; Bartels T; Abraham I; Patel H; Elquza E; Scott AJ; Malangone S; Hollings J; McBride A
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Mar; 27(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 30090991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W;
Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Green MD; Koelbl H; Baselga J; Galid A; Guillem V; Gascon P; Siena S; Lalisang RI; Samonigg H; Clemens MR; Zani V; Liang BC; Renwick J; Piccart MJ;
Ann Oncol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12488289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
Blackwell K; Donskih R; Jones CM; Nixon A; Vidal MJ; Nakov R; Singh P; Schaffar G; Gascón P; Harbeck N
Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27091420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of RGB-02, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III clinical study vs. reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Kahan Z; Grecea D; Smakal M; Tjulandin S; Bondarenko I; Perjesi L; Illes A; Horvat-Karajz K; Aradi I
BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):122. PubMed ID: 30727980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: Results of a Phase III Trial.
Schwartzberg LS; Bhat G; Peguero J; Agajanian R; Bharadwaj JS; Restrepo A; Hlalah O; Mehmi I; Chawla S; Hasal SJ; Yang Z; Cobb PW
Oncologist; 2020 Aug; 25(8):e1233-e1241. PubMed ID: 32476162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it reasonable to administer pegfilgrastim on day 1 of a myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen? A cost-utility analysis.
Billingsley CC; Cohn DE; Crim AK; Li Q; O'Malley DM; Havrilesky LJ
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2018; 14():21-25. PubMed ID: 30104004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy.
Bondarenko I; Gladkov OA; Elsaesser R; Buchner A; Bias P
BMC Cancer; 2013 Aug; 13():386. PubMed ID: 23945072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09.
Lee KH; Kim JY; Lee MH; Han HS; Lim JH; Park KU; Park IH; Cho EK; Yoon SY; Kim JH; Choi IS; Park JH; Choi YJ; Kim HJ; Jung KH; Kim SY; Oh DY; Im SA
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1709-17. PubMed ID: 26423618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neutropenia-Associated Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy With Reduced Doses of Pegfilgrastim.
Moore DC; Gebru T; Pellegrino A; Fasan A; Patel J; Ringley JT
J Pharm Pract; 2020 Dec; 33(6):779-783. PubMed ID: 30917723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim on survival outcomes of patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Lyman GH; Reiner M; Morrow PK; Crawford J
Ann Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1452-8. PubMed ID: 25851633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim compared to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) supporting a dose-intensive, rapidly cycling anti-metabolite containing chemotherapy regimen (Hyper-CVAD) for lymphoid malignancy.
Lane SW; Crawford J; Kenealy M; Cull G; Seymour JF; Prince HM; Marlton P; Gill D; Mollee PN
Leuk Lymphoma; 2006 Sep; 47(9):1813-7. PubMed ID: 17064993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): A Phase 3 study.
Cobb PW; Moon YW; Mezei K; Láng I; Bhat G; Chawla S; Hasal SJ; Schwartzberg LS
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6234-6243. PubMed ID: 32687266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
