164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26069863)
1. Quantitative carotid PET/MR imaging: clinical evaluation of MR-Attenuation correction versus CT-Attenuation correction in (18)F-FDG PET/MR emission data and comparison to PET/CT.
Bini J; Robson PM; Calcagno C; Eldib M; Fayad ZA
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015; 5(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 26069863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preclinical evaluation of MR attenuation correction versus CT attenuation correction on a sequential whole-body MR/PET scanner.
Bini J; Izquierdo-Garcia D; Mateo J; Machac J; Narula J; Fuster V; Fayad ZA
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 23296082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI.
Mehranian A; Arabi H; Zaidi H
Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 130():123-133. PubMed ID: 26853602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous carotid PET/MR: feasibility and improvement of magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction.
Bini J; Eldib M; Robson PM; Calcagno C; Fayad ZA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25898892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical assessment of MR-guided 3-class and 4-class attenuation correction in PET/MR.
Arabi H; Rager O; Alem A; Varoquaux A; Becker M; Zaidi H
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Apr; 17(2):264-76. PubMed ID: 25096328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging.
Izquierdo-Garcia D; Sawiak SJ; Knesaurek K; Narula J; Fuster V; Machac J; Fayad ZA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1574-84. PubMed ID: 24652234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative Evaluation of 2 Scatter-Correction Techniques for
Teuho J; Saunavaara V; Tolvanen T; Tuokkola T; Karlsson A; Tuisku J; Teräs M
J Nucl Med; 2017 Oct; 58(10):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 28336781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of attenuation correction of radiotherapy hardware for positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance in ano-rectal radiotherapy patients.
Wyatt JJ; Petrides G; Pearson RA; McCallum HM; Maxwell RJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 25(3):e14193. PubMed ID: 37922377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality assessment of automatic three-segment MR attenuation correction vs. CT attenuation correction.
Partovi S; Kohan A; Gaeta C; Rubbert C; Vercher-Conejero JL; Jones RS; O'Donnell JK; Wojtylak P; Faulhaber P
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 23638340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT.
Ripa RS; Knudsen A; Hag AM; Lebech AM; Loft A; Keller SH; Hansen AE; von Benzon E; Højgaard L; Kjær A
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013; 3(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 23900769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR-based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI.
Leynes AP; Yang J; Shanbhag DD; Kaushik SS; Seo Y; Hope TA; Wiesinger F; Larson PE
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):902-913. PubMed ID: 28112410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emission-based estimation of lung attenuation coefficients for attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4813-33. PubMed ID: 26047036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.
Visvikis D; Costa DC; Croasdale I; Lonn AH; Bomanji J; Gacinovic S; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar; 30(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 12634961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction of quantification errors in pelvic and spinal lesions caused by ignoring higher photon attenuation of bone in [18F]NaF PET/MR.
Schramm G; Maus J; Hofheinz F; Petr J; Lougovski A; Beuthien-Baumann B; Oehme L; Platzek I; van den Hoff J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6468-76. PubMed ID: 26520736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 56(6):877-83. PubMed ID: 25858043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
