These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26070101)

  • 1. Abdominal Hysterectomy: Reduced Risk of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique.
    Colling KP; Glover JK; Statz CA; Geller MA; Beilman GJ
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2015 Oct; 16(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 26070101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Brown O; Geynisman-Tan J; Gillingham A; Collins S; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K; Mueller M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1370-1376.e1. PubMed ID: 31672589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced surgical site infections in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.
    Pasam RT; Esemuede IO; Lee-Kong SA; Kiran RP
    Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Dec; 19(12):733-43. PubMed ID: 26415943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data.
    Mahdi H; Goodrich S; Lockhart D; DeBernardo R; Moslemi-Kebria M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):901-9. PubMed ID: 24768957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection in hysterectomy.
    Roy S; Patkar A; Daskiran M; Levine R; Hinoul P; Nigam S
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Jun; 15(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 24801549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
    Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
    JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.
    Chan JK; Gardner AB; Taylor K; Thompson CA; Blansit K; Yu X; Kapp DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 26363212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
    Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.