397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26070101)
1. Abdominal Hysterectomy: Reduced Risk of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique.
Colling KP; Glover JK; Statz CA; Geller MA; Beilman GJ
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2015 Oct; 16(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 26070101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Brown O; Geynisman-Tan J; Gillingham A; Collins S; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K; Mueller M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1370-1376.e1. PubMed ID: 31672589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced surgical site infections in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.
Pasam RT; Esemuede IO; Lee-Kong SA; Kiran RP
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Dec; 19(12):733-43. PubMed ID: 26415943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data.
Mahdi H; Goodrich S; Lockhart D; DeBernardo R; Moslemi-Kebria M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):901-9. PubMed ID: 24768957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection in hysterectomy.
Roy S; Patkar A; Daskiran M; Levine R; Hinoul P; Nigam S
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Jun; 15(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 24801549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.
Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.
Chan JK; Gardner AB; Taylor K; Thompson CA; Blansit K; Yu X; Kapp DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 26363212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
