These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26070645)

  • 1. Modeling the electromechanical impedance technique for the assessment of dental implant stability.
    LaMalfa Ribolla E; Rizzo P
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):1713-20. PubMed ID: 26070645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of postoperative dental implant primary stability using 3D finite element analysis.
    Pammer D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Feb; 22(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 30676075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical investigation of bone remodelling around immediately loaded dental implants using sika deer (Cervus nippon) antlers as implant bed.
    He Y; Hasan I; Keilig L; Fischer D; Ziegler L; Abboud M; Wahl G; Bourauel C
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Mar; 21(4):359-369. PubMed ID: 29658297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction of bone-dental implant with new ultra low modulus alloy using a numerical approach.
    Piotrowski B; Baptista AA; Patoor E; Bravetti P; Eberhardt A; Laheurte P
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 May; 38():151-60. PubMed ID: 24656363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of dental implant neck effects on primary stability and osseointegration in a type IV bone mandible.
    Huang YM; Chou IC; Jiang CP; Wu YS; Lee SY
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):1407-15. PubMed ID: 24212038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis.
    Deng B; Tan KB; Liu GR; Lu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19216277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
    Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Casale R MC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Mar; 101(3):297-314. PubMed ID: 21183241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical evaluation of nonbonded piezo sensor for biomedical diagnostics using electromechanical impedance technique.
    Srivastava S; Bhalla S
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Feb; 35(2):e3160. PubMed ID: 30281937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry.
    Winter W; Klein D; Karl M
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the biomechanical stability of a dental implant with quantitative ultrasound: A three-dimensional finite element study.
    Vayron R; Nguyen VH; Bosc R; Naili S; Haïat G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):773-80. PubMed ID: 26936559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.