These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26071514)

  • 21. Evaluating Competency for Execution after
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):530-535. PubMed ID: 32675330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some contrarian concerns about law, psychology, and public policy.
    Bersoff DN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Oct; 26(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 12412498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The DSM in litigation and legislation.
    Slovenko R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 21389161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Death penalty support for special offender populations of legally convicted murderers: juveniles, the mentally retarded, and the mentally incompetent.
    Boots DP; Heide KM; Cochran JK
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):223-38. PubMed ID: 15048861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Science in court: Smart enough to die?
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2014 Feb; 506(7488):284-6. PubMed ID: 24553224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neuropsychiatric Reflections on
    Fozdar MA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Jun; 48(2):151-154. PubMed ID: 32513759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Competency to Proceed to Trial Evaluations and Rational Understanding.
    Ragatz L; Vitacco MJ; Tross R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Dec; 59(14):1505-19. PubMed ID: 25080435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Of Atkins and men: deviations from clinical definitions of mental retardation in death penalty cases.
    Blume JH; Johnson SL; Seeds C
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2009; 18(3):689-733. PubMed ID: 19845060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retributive constraints on the concept of competency: the required role of 'patently false beliefs' in understanding competency to be executed.
    Saks E; Litt M
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 19156671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Power and Greed and the Corruptible Seed": Mental Disability, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and the Death Penalty.
    Perlin ML
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Sep; 43(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 26438801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mental retardation and the death penalty: a guide to State Legislative issues.
    Ellis JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2003; 27(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14651033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Murderer can be forced to take medication to become sane enough to be executed.
    Gottlieb S
    BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):889. PubMed ID: 14563734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A quick screening test of competency to stand trial for defendants with mental retardation.
    Smith SA; Hudson RL
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Feb; 76(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 7770598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dementia and the Death Penalty.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Nov; 49(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 31813185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing Adaptive Functioning in Death Penalty Cases after Hall and DSM-5.
    Hagan LD; Drogin EY; Guilmette TJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Mar; 44(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26944749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary: Atkins and clinical practice.
    Weiss KJ; Haskins B; Hauser MJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15515920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.